ICAI Board of Discipline Crackdowns Chartered Accountant Involved 8.27 Crore Redevelopment Fraud Case:

ICAI removed a CA from its register for three months after finding him guilty of professional misconduct and violation of auditor independence in a Mumbai redevelopment fraud case.
CA Revomed from Register Over Financial Misconduct in “CANVAS” Project

ICAI Board of Discipline Crackdowns Chartered Accountant Involved 8.27 Crore Redevelopment Fraud Case
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) Board of Discipline has taken this present disciplinary action against a Chartered Accountant (CA), Naresh Kishore Singh Rajpurohit, following a complaint filed by Mr Parag Manere, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Economic Offence Wing (EOW), Mumbai.
The case concerns an alleged financial fraud in a redevelopment project called “CANVAS” in Mumbai, where investors were misled into buying flats from a developer who did not have legal authority to sell them. The matter began from an earlier complaint and FIR registered against J.V. Developers and related entities in 2017. An investigation was initiated in regard to the same, which uncovered convoluted financial transactions involving Kamla Landmarc Group and its associate companies. A forensic audit was conducted in 2021, which unearthed convoluted financial linkages among the parties.
The audit further revealed that about Rs. 8.27 crores were collected by J.V. Developers from investors and routed through multiple intermediary companies, among which Rs. 2.5 crores were also transferred to the personal bank account of the respondent, and after that, passed on to another entity, Kunda Ankur Developers. Property transactions were also carried out in the names of the respondent’s wife and sister-in-law, funded by group companies and later sold at excessively higher prices, indicating circular movement of funds.
When interrogated with Respondent CA, he explicitly denied these claims and claimed that he was not linked to J.V. Developers and had resigned from Kamla Group entities in 2013. The funds received in his bank account were honest business loans that were repaid in FY 2013-14 and not sourced from investor money.
When the board examined the relevant facts and documents related to the case, it noted that the respondent had accepted receiving funds from companies for which he was serving as the statutory auditor. Despite being treated as loans, such transactions contravene auditor independence and professional ethics.
In conclusion to the aforesaid findings, the board held the respondent guilty of “Other Misconduct” under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and removed his name from the Register of Members for a period of three months.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2485My Recent Articles
- Trust’s Sections 12AB and 80G Registration Cannot Be Denied Before Charitable Project Is Completed, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Says Identity and Creditworthiness Irrelevant Where Loan Was Directly Paid to Haryana Mining DepartmentPremium
- Earlier Rejection Cannot Be Sole Ground to Reject Fresh Section 12AB and 80G Registration Applications, Says ITATPremium
- Cash Deposited During Demonetisation Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A if Linked to Business, Holds ITAT Premium
- ITAT Condones 1,731-Day Delay, Remands Cancer Trust's Section 12A Registration Application for Fresh ConsiderationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








