Entire Undisclosed Sales Cannot Be Taxed; Only Embedded Profit Liable: ITAT:

Entire Undisclosed Sales Cannot Be Taxed; Only Embedded Profit Liable: ITAT

ITAT holds that addition of full undisclosed turnover is unsustainable; directs taxation of profit @7.03% on omitted sales

ITAT Kolkata: Only Profit on Undisclosed Sales Taxable, Not Entire Turnover

authorMeetu KumaridateJan 4, 2026
Last update on Jan 4, 2026
Entire Undisclosed Sales Cannot Be Taxed; Only Embedded Profit Liable: ITAT The assessee, an individual engaged in the trading of bricks, cement, rods and other construction materials, filed his return of income for AY 2018-19 declaring income of Rs. 3,50,488. The return and tax audit report reflected a turnover of Rs 52,14,340. Based on information and bank statement analysis, the Assessing Officer noticed total bank deposits of Rs 1,06,74,737. Proceedings were initiated, and the assessment was completed under Sections 147 read with 144B by treating the difference of Rs 54,60,397 as undisclosed sales and adding the entire amount to income.
153C Jurisdiction Fails: ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes Rs. 4 Cr Addition and Penalty
The assessee contended that the short reporting of sales occurred due to an error by the auditor and that profit @7.03% had already been offered on the entire turnover, including the omitted sales, in response to notice. However, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal and confirmed the full addition. Question of Law: Whether the entire amount of undisclosed sales can be added to income, or only the profit element embedded in such sales is taxable.
ITAT Remands Jeweller’s Demonetisation Additions for Fresh Verification of Sales Evidence
ITAT's Decision: The ITAT held that even though the sales were understated due to the auditor’s mistake, the entire undisclosed turnover could not be brought to tax. It was observed that only the profit element embedded in the undisclosed sales is chargeable to tax. Since the assessee had already declared and offered profit @7.03% on the total turnover, including the undisclosed sales, the addition of the entire amount of Rs. 54,60,397 was unjustified. Thus, the Tribunal deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer and allowed the appeal of the assessee. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166
Up Next

Loading suggestions…