ITAT Remands Jeweller’s Demonetisation Additions for Fresh Verification of Sales Evidence

Cash sales during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained merely on estimation without verifying stock, quantity, and supporting invoices

ITAT on Demonetisation Cash Sales: Additions Remanded for Fresh Verification

Meetu Kumari | Jan 3, 2026 |

ITAT Remands Jeweller’s Demonetisation Additions for Fresh Verification of Sales Evidence

ITAT Remands Jeweller’s Demonetisation Additions for Fresh Verification of Sales Evidence

The assessee, an individual proprietor engaged in the business of jewellery trading, filed his return for AY 2017-18 declaring business income along with agricultural income. The case was selected for scrutiny.

During assessment, the Assessing Officer made multiple additions, including an addition for alleged unexplained cash deposits during the demonetisation period, an addition for the difference between turnover reported in monthly VAT returns and higher turnover recorded in books for September 2016, an addition towards the alleged excess turnover for October to December 2016 based on the estimated average sales, and addition of agricultural income as unexplained.

The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal by deleting the addition relating to agricultural income and part of demonetisation cash deposits but sustained additions relating to turnover differences and estimated excess sales. Aggrieved, the assessee approached the Tribunal.

Main Issue: Whether additions towards difference in turnover reported in VAT returns and books, and estimated excess turnover during demonetisation, could be sustained without proper verification of sales invoices, buyers’ details, stock availability, and after ignoring gross profit already offered in the books.

ITAT’s Decision: The ITAT held that mere difference between VAT returns and books, or an abnormal increase in sales during demonetisation, cannot automatically justify additions under sections 68 or 69A of the Act.

However, since the sales invoices produced were cash invoices lacking buyer identification and quantity reconciliation, and the lower authorities had not properly examined stock availability and genuineness of sales, the Tribunal restored both issues for fresh examination. The AO was directed to verify buyer details, quantity of goods sold vis-à-vis stock, genuineness of sales, and also consider the gross profit already declared on such sales. The appeal was partly allowed.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ITR Refund Delay Despite Timely Filing: Refunds May Take Till December 2026 ITAT Deletes Rs.32.04 Crore Addition u/s 68 for Lack of Fair Enquiry and Established Evidence ITAT Quashes LTCG Assessment as Time-Barred Where AO Invoked Section 142A Improperly ITAT Kolkata Quashes Rs. 90 Lakh Addition for Jurisdictional Overreach Late Filing of Form 67 Is Not Fatal: ITAT Kolkata Allows Foreign Tax CreditView All Posts