Ex Parte GST Order Set Aside Over Defective SCN and Denial of Hearing: Allahabad HC:

The High Court quashed an ex parte GST order due to violation of natural justice and directed the tax department to restart proceedings after giving the taxpayer a proper opportunity for a hearing.
HC Quashes Ex Parte GST Order for Breach of Natural Justice

Ex Parte GST Order Set Aside Over Defective SCN and Denial of Hearing: Allahabad HC
The High Court quashed an ex parte GST order, finding a violation of natural justice and sent the case back to the tax department to restart proceedings, giving petitioners a proper chance of hearing.
The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, has heard a writ petition filed by M/S Bimlesh Thru. Proprietor Bimlesh and Another, challenging an ex-parte GST order dated February 22, 2025 and a Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated November 29, 2024, issued for the Financial Year 2020-21.
The petitioner claimed that the impugned notice and proceedings were improper because the response date and the date of hearing were both fixed on the same date, and they were also not given a proper chance of hearing, which is an explicit violation of the principles of natural justice. The petitioner referenced an earlier High Court judgement endorsing the same claim.
When the court analysed the facts of the case, it noted that the tax authorities should have given petitioners a proper chance of hearing before issuing any adverse order. The Court examined the earlier ruling and noted that authorities must provide a meaningful opportunity for a personal hearing before passing any adverse order. If the notice itself is defective or the hearing is not properly granted, the entire proceeding becomes legally invalid. The Court observed that in this case the initial show cause notice was flawed, and the department failed to issue a fresh and proper notice before passing the order.
Even though the writ petition was filed after the normal appeal time limit, the Court stated that it can still intervene in exceptional cases where natural justice is violated. As a result, the Court quashed and set aside the impugned ex parte order dated February 22, 2025, and remanded the case to the tax authorities to freshly start the proceedings by issuing a proper show cause notice and following the law. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2450My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Rs 12 Lakh Section 68 Addition After Assessee Proves Lender’s Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuine TransactionPremium
- ITAT Holds Approval Should Be Taken from PCCIT under Section 151(ii) When Section 148 Notice Is After 3-Year Time LimitPremium
- ITAT Sets Aside CIT(E)’s Rejection of Charitable Trust’s Section 12AB Registration and 80G Approval ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Upholds Section 148 Reopening But Restricts Rs 30 Lakh Accommodation Entry Addition To 5%, Cites Double TaxationPremium
- Claiming Full TDS Credit Without Reporting Entire Income Is Underreporting, Not Misreporting: ITAT Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








