GST Appeal cannot be rejected merely for wrong jurisdiction: High Court Revives LIC's Appeal:

The Orissa HC restored LIC’s appeal, ruling that its rejection was due to a jurisdictional error by tax authorities and directing its transfer within 15 days.
HC Quashes Wrongful Appeal Rejection Order

GST Appeal cannot be rejected merely for wrong jurisdiction: High Court Revives LIC's Appeal
The Orissa High Court restores the LIC's appeal, holding that the appeal rejection was a mistake on the part of the tax authorities. Hence, the court has assured the company that its appeal will be sent to the appropriate judicial authority within 15 days.
The appeal was filed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), challenging an order dated May 30, 2025, passed by the Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise (Appeal), Bhubaneswar. The impugned order had rejected the company's appeal on the grounds that the appeal was filed in the wrong jurisdiction. Thereafter, the company approached the Orissa High Court, Cuttack.
Initially, the company had filed an appeal challenging an order-in-original dated January 28, 2025, and a summary order dated February 04, 2025, passed by the Additional Commissioner and Commissioner, Bhubaneswar IV Circle, Bhubaneswar, respectively. The said Order-in-Original was passed against the company for having its offices across the country, and for matters relating to Odisha, LIC filed its appeal in Bhubaneswar on April 27, 2025. However, the appeal was dismissed without proper consideration, citing jurisdictional issues.
During the hearing of the court before the high court, the department claimed that at the time of rejection, there was no system to automatically transfer appeals filed under the wrong jurisdiction to the correct jurisdiction. Such a system was later developed through an advisory in July 2025. The department had suggested to the company that it could re-file the appeal; it thereafter transferred its appeal to the correct authority.
When the court heard both of the sides, it noted that the mistake was of the tax authorities; the rejection of the appeal was due to an error. Considering the same, without examining the merits of the case, the court quashed the rejection order dated May 30, 2025, and restored the company's appeal. The court has assured the company that its appeals will be transferred to the relevant appellate authority within 15 days.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2638My Recent Articles
- Indian Railway Finance Corporation Faces Rs 549 Crore GST Demand Over Alleged Excess ITC Availment for FY 2022-23
- Section 23(5) Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Unsold Flats: ITAT Deletes Rs 31.56 Lakh Deemed Rent AdditionPremium
- CBI Files 18th Chargesheet Against MKHS Housing, Indiabulls Entities in Homebuyers Major Fraud Case
- ITAT Deletes Section 263 Revision, Holds Explained Purchase Difference Cannot Make Assessment Prejudicial to RevenuePremium
- TDS Deposited Later Cannot Remain a Principal Liability Under Section 201(1): ITAT Remands Rs. 6.67 Lakh TDS DisputePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







