ROC Penalises Director for Incorrect E-form AOC-4 Filing:

ROC Mumbai fined a company director Rs. 10,000 for an incorrect AOC-4 filing due to a clerical error under the Companies Act, 2013.
Minor E-Filing Error Costs Director Rs. 10,000 Penalty

ROC Penalises Director for Incorrect E-form AOC-4 Filing
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Mumbai has issued an order of adjudication dated January 23, 2026, imposing a penalty amounting to Rs. 10,000 on the director of Sub Zero Insulation Technologies Private Limited, named Rashmi Anand, having DIN 00366258. The penalty has been levied under Section 454 of the Companies Act 2013 for the contravention of Section 450 of the Act.
The company had voluntarily filed an adjudication application dated November 28, 2025, under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, adding the incorrect filing of E-form AOC-4 for the Financial Year 2024-25. The ROC asked for clarification on December 11, 2025, and replied on December 22, 2025.
The key default in the present case was that a required field related to the rebate/drawback of taxes and duties was mistakenly left empty due to a clerical mistake. The form was required to be digitally signed and declared by the company's director, i.e., Ms Rasmi Anand.
Under the provisions of the company rules, the individual who signs and certifies an electronic form is also responsible for the correctness of its details and attachments. Since the disputed forms include mistakes in them, the director is held responsible for non-compliance and hence also entitled to the required penal action under Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013. In conclusion, the ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000 on the director. Additionally, directed to pay the penalty amount and rectify the default within 90 days from receipt of the order.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2587My Recent Articles
- Rs 1.48 Crore Interest on Delayed Property Payments Qualifies as Cost of Acquisition: ITAT DelhiPremium
- ROC Penalises Company and Director Rs 20,000 for Wrong AGM Date in Form AOC-4CFSPremium
- ROC Penalises Company's Eight Directors Over Non-Appointment of Two Independent Directors for FY 2015-16 to 2018-19Premium
- An Inadvertent Typographical Error in Tax Audit Report Should Not Lead to An Unmerited Disallowance, Rules ITATPremium
- 21 CBI Officials Honoured With President’s Medals for Distinguished and Meritorious Service on 80th Independence Day
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







