ROC Pune Imposes Penalty on Company for Failure to Disclose Certain Information in Form MGT-14

The ROC imposed a penalty of Rs 1,00,000 on Arcatron Mobility and Rs 25,000 only on its one director, who was designated as the officer in default by the board resolution of the company.

Company Fined Over Disclosure Lapses

Nidhi | Jan 24, 2026 |

ROC Pune Imposes Penalty on Company for Failure to Disclose Certain Information in Form MGT-14

ROC Pune Imposes Penalty on Company for Failure to Disclose Certain Information in Form MGT-14

The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Pune, has slapped a penalty against a company and its director for a disclosure lapse under the Companies Act.

During the due diligence, the company, Arcatron Mobility Private Limited, realised that while issuing and allotting shares, it had failed to disclose certain required information in the supporting documents attached to e-form MGT-14 filed by the company. This disclosure was a mandatory requirement under Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014.

On discovering this mistake, the company itself admitted its default by filing a suo moto application seeking the adjudication of a penalty under section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013. The company submitted that the violation was unintentional and caused by negligence.

The ROC declared the company and its directors liable for a penalty under Section 450 of the Companies Act 2013 for violating Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014. Since the company qualified as a small company under the Companies Act, its penalty was reduced under Section 446B of the Act.

Accordingly, the ROC imposed a penalty of Rs 1,00,000 on Arcatron Mobility and Rs 25,000 only on its one director, who was designated as the officer in default by the board resolution of the company.

The company and the concerned director were directed to correct the default and pay the penalty within 90 days from the receipt of the order. The penalty must be paid through the MCA e-Adjudication portal, and the director must pay from personal income.

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"


Tags: ROC


Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ROC Pune Imposes Penalty on Company for Failure to Disclose Certain Information in Form MGT-14 Big TDS Relief: ITAT Says AMC Is Not Fee for Technical Services Under Section 9(1) Big Section 68 Relief: ITAT Says Written Loan Agreement or Interest Not Essential to Prove Loan Genuineness GST Evasion: ED Conducts Multi-State Searches in Rs 658 Crore GST ITC Fraud Case GSTN Releases Advisory on RSP-Based Valuation of Notified Tobacco Goods under GSTView All Posts