GST: High Court Quashes Orders Passed Without Hearing Amid Petitioner’s Husband’s Demise:

HC sets aside GST adjudication orders against Divya Sood, remands matter for fresh hearing, pending SC’s verdict on notification under Section 168A of the CGST Act.
Relief Granted in GST Case Pending SC Verdict on Notification Validity

GST: High Court Quashes Orders Passed Without Hearing Amid Petitioner’s Husband’s Demise
The present writ petition is being filed by a businesswoman named Divya Sood (petitioner) in the Delhi High Court against the Commissioner of State Goods and Services (respondent). The benches comprised Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Shail Jain. The woman challenged two GST orders dated 10th August, 2024, and 18th August, 2024. The impugned order was related to the financial year 2019-20. Additionally, she challenged a government notification No. 56/2023, dated 28th December 2023, which extended the time for GST authorities to take action.
In this case, the Court recognised that Divya Sood did not get a fair chance due to personal tragedy. It allowed her to present her case properly before the GST department and put everything on hold until the Supreme Court decides on the legal validity of the GST notification she challenged.
Her husband, a Chartered Accountant (CA), handled the business finances. Her husband was sent two show-cause notices dated 18th and 23rd May 2024, but due to his serious illness and sudden death on 11th April 2025, she was unaware of the notices. Hence, could not file any reply to the notices and also did not appear for any hearing by the GST authorities. In conclusion, the department issued a final ex parte order against her.
Then she approached the Delhi High Court, where the court said that the notification she challenged had already been legally questioned previously in several courts, and every court had given different views on it:
- The Allahabad and Patna High Courts upheld it.
- The Guwahati High Court struck it down.
- The Telangana High Court raised concerns.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2484My Recent Articles
- ITAT Says Identity and Creditworthiness Irrelevant Where Loan Was Directly Paid to Haryana Mining DepartmentPremium
- Earlier Rejection Cannot Be Sole Ground to Reject Fresh Section 12AB and 80G Registration Applications, Says ITATPremium
- Cash Deposited During Demonetisation Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A if Linked to Business, Holds ITAT Premium
- ITAT Condones 1,731-Day Delay, Remands Cancer Trust's Section 12A Registration Application for Fresh ConsiderationPremium
- ITAT Lowers Estimated Profit Rate from 8% to 4% After Considering State Shutdown and Medicine Trade MarginsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.







