GST: High Court Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation for Ignoring Taxpayer’s Reply

High Court quashes GST registration cancellation where the authority failed to consider the dealer’s reply and supporting documents.

HC Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Consideration of Reply

Meetu Kumari | Jan 28, 2026 |

GST: High Court Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation for Ignoring Taxpayer’s Reply

GST: High Court Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation for Ignoring Taxpayer’s Reply

N.K.R. Enterprise, a proprietary concern, was issued a show-cause notice in Form GST REG-17 proposing cancellation of its GST registration under Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017. The notice was founded on an internal “confidential communication” from the enforcement wing recommending cancellation in the interest of revenue.

The petitioner submitted a detailed reply on 13.08.2025 through the GST portal, enclosing documents to demonstrate that no ineligible input tax credit had been availed. However, the Superintendent passed a final order cancelling the GST registration without considering or recording any finding on the reply or the supporting material. Aggrieved, the petitioner approached the High Court.

Issue Before HC: Whether cancellation of GST registration is valid when the adjudicating authority ignores the taxpayer’s reply and supporting documents and records no findings on the merits.

HC Ruled: The Hon’ble High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the cancellation order. The Court held that a fundamental procedural flaw vitiated the impugned order, as the authority had completely failed to consider the petitioner’s reply and documentary evidence.

The Court observed that an order affecting civil rights must disclose due application of mind to the explanation offered by the affected party. Passing a cancellation order without dealing with the reply on merits renders the decision arbitrary and unsustainable in law.

Therefore, the matter was remanded to the Superintendent with a direction to grant the petitioner a proper opportunity of hearing and to pass a fresh, reasoned order within twelve weeks.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
No Direct Link, No Reopening: High Court Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Based on Broker’s Loose Papers Old TDS Dispute Settled: Delhi HC Limits Airline’s Liability to Interest Only One-Day PF Delay Due to Tech Glitch Allowed; Excess DDT on UK Dividends Refundable ITAT Upholds CPC Disallowance of Delayed PF & ESI Contributions Despite Pre-Return Payment Gujarat High Court Directs GST Refund on Leasehold Transfer, Warns of Costs for DelayView All Posts