GST: No Hearing, No Demand; HC Sets Aside ITC Liability Over Natural Justice Violation

The <a href="https://studycafe.in/calcutta-high-court-denies-relief-to-west-bengal-excise-officer-in-bribery-case-414055.html">Calcutta High Court</a> quashed an order raising a demand on the taxpayer on the ground of alleged incorrect availment of ITC (Input Tax Credit).

The petitioner was issued a show cause notice (SCN) dated June 3, 2022, raising allegations of wrongly availing input tax credit (ITC) worth Rs 3.06 lakh regarding supplies of goods from an entity that, when investigated, was found to be non-existent and also registered using fake documents. Additionally, the <a href="https://studycafe.in/gst-registration-cannot-be-cancelled-due-to-filing-of-nil-return-uttarakhand-hc-415833.html">GST registration</a> for the supplier had already been found to be cancelled retrospectively.

<div class="related-article-inline">Also Read<a href="/major-changes-introduced-to-itr-1-form-effective-ay-2026-27-415839.html" class="related-link">Major Changes Introduced to ITR -1 Form; Effective AY 2026-27</a></div>

Despite the petitioner having responded to the SCN, no opportunity for a hearing was granted to the petitioner. The Adjudicating Authority issued a final order dated March 27, 2023, imposing a tax, interest, and <a href="https://studycafe.in/roc-slaps-penalty-on-company-and-its-directors-for-delay-in-filing-form-mgt-14-415635.html">penalty</a> of Rs. 3.06 lakh, Rs. 2.47 lakh, and Rs. 3.06 lakh, respectively, on the petitioner.

When the court analysed the facts of the case, it held that denying a personal hearing at the initial adjudication stage reflects a contravention of the provisions of Section 75(4) of the Act and <a href="https://studycafe.in/ignoring-taxpayer-reply-violates-principles-of-natural-justice-hc-remands-gst-case-for-fresh-consideration-415586.html">principles of natural justice</a>. Further highlighted that such a defect cannot be corrected during the appeal, as it goes to the root of the matter. The Court relied on judicial precedents to support this view.

<div class="related-article-inline">Also Read<a href="/roc-fines-company-and-directors-for-not-operating-from-its-registered-office-address-415695.html" class="related-link">ROC Fines Company and Directors For Not Operating from Its Registered Office Address</a></div>

In conclusion to the aforementioned findings, the court quashed both the initial and appellate orders. The case is sent back to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration. This time tax authorities have been directed to grant the petitioner a fair opportunity of hearing and complete the process within 30 days, and any amount deposited by the petitioner has been instructed to be refunded within two weeks. Allowed the petitioner's writ petition.

GST: No Hearing, No Demand; HC Sets Aside ITC Liability Over Natural Justice Violation

The <a href="https://studycafe.in/calcutta-high-court-denies-relief-to-west-bengal-excise-officer-in-bribery-case-414055.html">Calcutta High Court</a> quashed an order raising a demand on the taxpayer on the ground of alleged incorrect availment of ITC (Input Tax Credit).

The petitioner was issued a show cause notice (SCN) dated June 3, 2022, raising allegations of wrongly availing input tax credit (ITC) worth Rs 3.06 lakh regarding supplies of goods from an entity that, when investigated, was found to be non-existent and also registered using fake documents. Additionally, the <a href="https://studycafe.in/gst-registration-cannot-be-cancelled-due-to-filing-of-nil-return-uttarakhand-hc-415833.html">GST registration</a> for the supplier had already been found to be cancelled retrospectively.

[related id="415839"]

Despite the petitioner having responded to the SCN, no opportunity for a hearing was granted to the petitioner. The Adjudicating Authority issued a final order dated March 27, 2023, imposing a tax, interest, and <a href="https://studycafe.in/roc-slaps-penalty-on-company-and-its-directors-for-delay-in-filing-form-mgt-14-415635.html">penalty</a> of Rs. 3.06 lakh, Rs. 2.47 lakh, and Rs. 3.06 lakh, respectively, on the petitioner.

When the court analysed the facts of the case, it held that denying a personal hearing at the initial adjudication stage reflects a contravention of the provisions of Section 75(4) of the Act and <a href="https://studycafe.in/ignoring-taxpayer-reply-violates-principles-of-natural-justice-hc-remands-gst-case-for-fresh-consideration-415586.html">principles of natural justice</a>. Further highlighted that such a defect cannot be corrected during the appeal, as it goes to the root of the matter. The Court relied on judicial precedents to support this view.

[related id="415695"]

In conclusion to the aforementioned findings, the court quashed both the initial and appellate orders. The case is sent back to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration. This time tax authorities have been directed to grant the petitioner a fair opportunity of hearing and complete the process within 30 days, and any amount deposited by the petitioner has been instructed to be refunded within two weeks. Allowed the petitioner's writ petition.

The HC held that denying a personal hearing at the initial adjudication stage reflects contravention to the provisions of Section 75(4) of the Act and principles of natural justice.

GST: No Hearing, No Demand; HC Sets Aside ITC Liability Over Natural Justice Violation

GSTN has issued FAQs clarifying the mandatory Ship-to field and voluntary e-Way Bill closure process.

GSTN Releases FAQs on Mandatory Ship-to Field and Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure

Haryana Tops Nation in SGST Growth with 22% Rise in May 2026 Collections

SEBI Launches Settlement Helpdesk Facility to Simplify Settlement Application Process

Gujarat AAR Clarifies Compensation Recovered from Transporters for Transit Losses Is Not Liable to GST

Haryana Rolls Out One-Time Settlement Scheme for Pending Pre-GST Tax Cases

ITAT Allows Foreign Tax Credit of Rs. 13.91 Lakh Holding Late Filing of Form 67 Cannot Deny FTC Claim

GSTN Revises AATO Amendment Timeline for FY 2025-26, Introduces Automatic Turnover Updates

In a significant ruling, the ITAT quashed an income tax assessment after holding that the order attained legal existence only upon being digitally signed.

ITAT Holds Assessment Order Is Legally Complete Only After Digital Signature; Time-Barred Order Quashed

HC Denies Anticipatory Bail to Material Supplier in Alleged Nal-Jal Yojana Fraud Over Missing GST Bills and Invoices

Income Tax Dept Removes ‘Other Exempt Income’ Option from ITR Forms, Revises Schedule EI for AY 2026-27

High Court Grants Bail to Employee in Rs 35.19 Lakh Hotel Fund Misappropriation Case

Income Tax

Finance

ICAI

Judgement

ITAT Delhi

ITAT

Chartered Accountant

Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

CBDT

ITAT Remands Rs 20.50 Lakh Section 69A Addition After Finding Assessee Was Denied Adequate Hearing 

Hyderabad Zone Marks Nine Successful Years of GST Implementation

ITR Filing 2026: Key Conditions for Claiming HRA Exemption While Filing Income Tax Return