GST On Mining Royalty: Maharashtra AAR Rules Leasing of Mines Taxable as Licensing Service At 18%:

Royalty paid to State Government held consideration for licensing right to use minerals, not transfer of right to use goods
GST on mining royalty: Maharashtra AAR holds royalty taxable at 18% as licensing service

GST On Mining Royalty: Maharashtra AAR Rules Leasing of Mines Taxable as Licensing Service At 18%
The applicant, M/s. Ramandeep Upkarsingh Bindra, is engaged in mining and quarrying of minor minerals such as black rock and stones in Maharashtra. For carrying out mining operations, the applicant obtained a mining lease from the State Government under the Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction (Development and Regulation) Rules, 2013. The applicant was required to pay royalty or dead rent to the State Government, calculated on the quantity of minerals extracted.
The applicant contended that royalty represented consideration for the transfer of the right to use minerals and should therefore be classified as leasing services involving transfer of right to use goods. An advance ruling was sought to determine the correct classification and applicable GST rate on royalty paid for the mining lease.
Main Issue: Whether royalty paid to the State Government for the grant of a mining lease is classifiable as transfer of right to use goods under Entry 17(iii) of Notification No. 11/2017–CT (Rate), attracting GST at the same rate as the supply of minerals, or as licensing services for the right to use minerals under Heading 9973, taxable at 18%.
AAR Ruled: The Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling held that the grant of a mining lease by the State Government does not amount to the transfer of the right to use goods. It was observed that ownership of minerals always vests with the State and that royalty is merely a consideration for permission to extract minerals subject to statutory control. The applicant does not receive exclusive possession or ownership of the minerals in situ, but only a regulated licence to exploit them.
The Authority ruled that the activity is classifiable under Heading 9973, specifically under sub-heading 997337 as “licensing services for the right to use minerals including its exploration and evaluation.” The service does not fall under Entry 17(iii) of Notification No. 11/2017–CT (Rate). The royalty paid is therefore liable to GST at 18% under the residual licensing category, payable by the applicant under the reverse charge mechanism.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2182My Recent Articles
- ITAT: Entire Bogus Billing Bank Credits Cannot Be Taxed as IncomePremium
- ITAT Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Following Supreme Court Limitation RulingsPremium
- ITAT Allows BSNL VRS Exemption Despite Omission in Income Tax ReturnPremium
- ITAT Allows BSNL VRS Tax Exemption Despite No Return ClaimPremium
- ITAT Grants BSNL VRS Exemption Despite No Claim in ReturnPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








