ITAT Quashes Assessment After Holding PCIT Lacked Power to Transfer Corporate Case:

Final assessment declared void as PCIT Delhi-10 lacked authority to transfer corporate assessee’s case
ITAT Quashes Assessment After Holding Section 127 Transfer Order Without Jurisdiction

ITAT Quashes Assessment After Holding PCIT Lacked Power to Transfer Corporate Case
Kunshan Q Tech Microelectronics (India) Pvt. Ltd. was subjected to a final assessment for AY 2021-22, determining total income of over Rs. 353 crore, as against a returned loss of about Rs. 98.71 crore. During appellate proceedings before the Tribunal, the assessee raised an additional ground challenging the very jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer who framed the assessment.
The challenge stemmed from an order dated 27.05.2022 passed under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, whereby the assessee’s case was transferred from Ward-31, New Delhi to Central Circle-30, Delhi. The assessee contended that the transfer order was passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-10, who did not have jurisdiction over corporate assessees, as the said charge was notified for “Non-Corporate” cases. Based on this, it was argued that the transfer itself was void and all proceedings flowing from it were without authority of law.
Issue Raised: Whether the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, had the legal jurisdiction to pass the transfer order under Section 127 in respect of a corporate assessee, and if not, whether the assessment framed by the transferee Assessing Officer could survive.
ITAT Held: The Tribunal accepted the additional ground raised by the assessee and quashed the final assessment order. It held that jurisdiction under the Income Tax Act is not a matter of assumption but flows strictly from CBDT notifications issued under Section 120.
Applying the settled principle of sublato fundamento cadit opus, that once the foundation is removed, the superstructure must fall, the Tribunal held that the Section 127 transfer order was void ab initio. Therefore, all proceedings initiated by the transferee Assessing Officer, including the final assessment order were held to be without jurisdiction and a nullity in the eyes of law.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








