GSTAT Now Operational: Allahabad HC Directs Taxpayer to File Appeal Before by June 30:

The Allahabad High Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the petitioner to file an appeal before the now-operational GST Appellate Tribunal by June 30, 2026.
HC Sends GST Dispute to Tribunal as GSTAT Becomes Functional

GSTAT Now Operational: Allahabad HC Directs Taxpayer to File Appeal Before by June 30
The Allahabad High Court delivered its judgement on a case titled Qmtraders vs. State of UP and Two Others' on February 25, 2026. The petition was initially filed because the GST Appellate Tribunal at that point was not constituted, leaving taxpayers without a proper forum to challenge orders passed under Sections 107 and 108 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Later, the situation changed when the government constituted the GST Appellate Tribunal through an order dated September 24, 2025. Further, its members were appointed through an Office Order No. 03/2025 dated December 26, 2025, with directions to join their respective benches by January 21, 2026. Additionally, procedural rules for the Tribunal were issued through a notification dated April 24, 2025, under Section 111 of the GST Act.
Accordingly, the Tribunal is now in operation; the Court observed that keeping the writ petition pending would serve no useful purpose. Therefore, without examining the legality or validity of the disputed orders, the Court disposed of the petition and directed the petitioner to appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal, since the tribunal has now become operational.
The court has given the petitioner time until June 30, 2026, to file an appeal before the GSTAT under Section 112 of the GST Act, with instructions that no further relaxation in the time limit will be given if it misses the prescribed time limit. The Court also stated that any amount already deposited by the petitioner during the writ proceedings would be treated as compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act, provided the petitioner submits proof along with the interim order.
At the end of the ruling, the Court directed that if any defects are found in the appeal, the Tribunal registry must inform the petitioner within three weeks, and the petitioner must rectify the defect within 30 days.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2492My Recent Articles
- ITAT Invalidates Entire Assessment Proceedings Over Failure to Issue Mandatory Section 143(2) Notice Within Prescribed Time LimitedPremium
- ITAT Holds CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Taxpayer’s Appeal Merely Over Non-Prosecution Without Merit HearingPremium
- ITAT Remands TDS Appeal After CIT(A) Failed to Decide Actual CAM Charges IssuePremium
- ITAT Rules in Taxpayer's Favour, Holds Delay in Filing Form 67 Cannot Be Sole Ground to Deny Foreign Tax CreditPremium
- ITAT Revives Tax Appeals for Six AYs After Finding Insufficient Hearing Time and Ignored Adjournment RequestPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








