GSTN Flags ITC Mismatch: Rule 37A Triggers Major ITC Reversal Drive for FY 2024-25:

GSTN has issued Rule 37A notices directing taxpayers to reverse ITC for FY 2024-25 where suppliers uploaded invoices but failed to file GSTR-3B.
GSTN Sends Rule 37A Mismatch Notices to Taxpayers

GSTN Flags ITC Mismatch: Rule 37A Triggers Major ITC Reversal Drive for FY 2024-25
Infosys GSTN has sent notices to taxpayers under Rule 37A of the CGST Rules, 2017, regarding Input Tax Credit (ITC) reversal for the financial year (FY) 2024-25.
Rule 37A of the CGST Rules, 2017, says that if you take ITC (Input Tax Credit) from your supplier based on the invoices uploaded by him/her in GSTR-1 / 1A / IFF, then you should reverse the ITC if your supplier has not furnished GSTR-3B for the corresponding tax period by September 30 of the next financial year.
So let's discuss what exactly the case is:
What You Need to Do
You have to check the list of suppliers mentioned in the notices sent and identify the ITC you took from these suppliers. If your supplier still does not furnish their GSTR-3B, then reverse your ITC. If the supplier later files their GSTR-3B, they will be able to reclaim your ITC; hence, you do not need to worry about the ITC.
- GSTN examines your ITC first and then searches for the suppliers who upload invoices in GSTR-1, so that you claim your ITC, but then simultaneously do not furnish their GSTR-3B for those months.
- Non-Filing of GSTR-3B clearly means that the supplier has not paid tax to the government.
- To curb this activity and mismatch, GSTN has asked taxpayers to reverse their ITCs in these cases.
What You Need to Do
You have to check the list of suppliers mentioned in the notices sent and identify the ITC you took from these suppliers. If your supplier still does not furnish their GSTR-3B, then reverse your ITC. If the supplier later files their GSTR-3B, they will be able to reclaim your ITC; hence, you do not need to worry about the ITC.About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2634My Recent Articles
- TDS Deposited Later Cannot Remain a Principal Liability Under Section 201(1): ITAT Remands Rs. 6.67 Lakh TDS DisputePremium
- Technical AI Courses vs Non-Tech AI Courses in Mumbai: Which Fits a Non-Coding Background?
- Bland Statement Alleging Fraud or Concealment of Facts Not Enough to Invoke Section 74 Extended Limitation: SCPremium
- ED Conducts Searches at Nine Locations in UP and Haryana Over Rs 9.63 Crore GST Fraud
- ICAI CCM Resigns, Alleges Neglect of CA Students and Misuse of Student Funds on WOFA, Foreign Travel
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Tags
Recent Posts
All Posts







