Gujarat High Court Quashes Rs. 18.49 Crore GST Demand Order Against Bajaj Healthcare:

The High Court quashes the Rs. 18.49 crore GST demand issued against Bajaj Healthcare over an alleged wrong ITC refund claim. giving the company full relief in its refund dispute.
Gujarat HC Nullifies GST Demand Order

Gujarat High Court Quashes Rs. 18.49 Crore GST Demand Order Against Bajaj Healthcare
Bajaj Healthcare Limited has recently issued a regulatory filing dated December 06, 2025, addressed to the BSE Limited and National Stock Exchange of India Limited, in pursuance of Regulation 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Previously, the company vide intimation dated October 29, 2024, informed that it had received a GST order dated October 25, 2024, passed by the Company by Joint Commissioner, Vadodara-II. The order imposed a tax/cess demand of Rs. 18.49 crore on the company.
The said demand order was issued by the tax department because the Company claimed a GST refund of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for exports using the wrong rule. They had used Rule 89(4) instead of Rule 89(4A) or 89(4B), which were actually the correct rules for their refund type.
Anyways, the company was eligible to receive a GST refund of Rs. 17.41 crore as Input Tax Credit (ITC), even if we accept what the order says. Still, the Company was planning to file an appeal challenging the said order before the Appellate Authority.
On December 6, 2025, the company filed an appeal before the Hon’ble High Court, Gujarat, challenging the demand order dated October 25, 2024. Through the present regulatory filing, the company has informed us that the Gujarat High Court has ruled in its favour and has quashed the GST order dated October 25, 2024. December 06, 2025, was the date to download the order from the official website of the Gujarat High Court. As per the information shared by the company, as of now, it has not received any physical/email copy of the said order.
The company further highlights that this action does not impact its financials, operations or other activities.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2487My Recent Articles
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.39 Crore Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition After Main Director’s DeathPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer Fresh Opportunity to Contest Rs 44.16 Lakh Addition After Finding No Decision on MeritsPremium
- Trust’s Sections 12AB and 80G Registration Cannot Be Denied Before Charitable Project Is Completed, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Says Identity and Creditworthiness Irrelevant Where Loan Was Directly Paid to Haryana Mining DepartmentPremium
- Earlier Rejection Cannot Be Sole Ground to Reject Fresh Section 12AB and 80G Registration Applications, Says ITATPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








