HC Allows Delayed GST Appeal; Exceptional Hardship Justifies Condonation:

HC Allows Delayed GST Appeal; Exceptional Hardship Justifies Condonation

Court allows delayed GST appeal citing repeated family tragedies and genuine inability to comply

High Court Excuses Delay Under Section 107; Appeal to Be Heard on Merits.

authorMeetu KumaridateApr 27, 2026
Last update on Apr 27, 2026
HC Allows Delayed GST Appeal; Exceptional Hardship Justifies Condonation The petitioner, M/s Ramdev Builders, challenged GST demand orders for FY 2017–18, 2018–19, and 2019–20, where substantial tax liability was raised on account of alleged excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed. The petitioner could not file appeals within the prescribed limitation period under Section 107 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, due to a series of tragic personal events. It was submitted that between 2019 and early 2025, the family suffered five consecutive bereavements, including the death of the managing partner and close family members. These events led to severe emotional and financial disruption, making it practically impossible to pursue legal remedies or arrange pre-deposit for filing appeals. As the appellate portal reflected the appeal as time-barred, the petitioner approached the High Court seeking condonation of delay and a direction to entertain the appeal.
Section 87A Rebate Cannot be Disallowed Against STCG If Income Is Below Rs 7 Lakh: ITAT
Central Issue: Whether delay in filing GST appeal beyond the statutory limitation period under Section 107 can be condoned by the High Court in exercise of writ jurisdiction due to exceptional and unavoidable circumstances. HC Held: The Rajasthan High Court allowed the writ petition and condoned the delay in filing the appeal. The Court observed that although the Appellate Authority is strictly bound by the limitation prescribed under Section 107, the facts of the case disclosed genuine hardship beyond the control of the petitioner. Taking note of continuous family tragedies and the resulting mental and financial distress, the Court held that denying an opportunity to contest the matter on merits would cause serious prejudice.
CBIC Clarifies Drawback Eligibility on Re-Export of SEZ-Sourced Goods
Following its consistent view in similar cases, the Court directed the Appellate Authority to entertain the appeal and decide it on merits. The Court also recorded that the challenge to the vires of Section 107(4) was not pressed and kept the issue open for future adjudication. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below.

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…