High Court Denies NIL TDS Certificate on Virtual Technical Services:

High Court Denies NIL TDS Certificate on Virtual Technical Services

The Bombay High Court denies the NIL TDS certificate due to a pending dispute about the taxability of services.

Pending Taxability Issue Bars Grant of NIL Withholding Certificate

authorMeetu KumaridateApr 8, 2026
Last update on Apr 8, 2026
High Court Denies NIL TDS Certificate on Virtual Technical Services

Benteler Automotive (China) Investment Limited, a tax resident of China and the Asia-Pacific headquarters of the Benteler Group, had an arrangement with its Indian subsidiary, Benteler India Pvt. Ltd. Under this agreement, the Chinese entity provided management support, IT services, and technical assistance remotely without sending any employees to India.

GST: No Hearing, No Demand; HC Sets Aside ITC Liability Over Natural Justice Violation

Payments were made on a cost-plus 5% basis, and the Indian company deducted TDS at 10%. The company applied for a NIL withholding certificate under Section 197 of the Income-tax Act, arguing that these receipts should not be taxed in India under the India-China DTAA. However, the tax authorities rejected the application. Importantly, the same taxability issue had already arisen in earlier years and was pending before appellate authorities. Challenging this rejection, the petitioner approached the Bombay High Court.

Central Issue: Whether services rendered entirely from China can be treated as “fees for technical services” under Article 12(4) of the India-China DTAA, and whether a NIL withholding certificate should be granted when the same issue is already under appeal.

Company and Directors Fined for Non-Disclosure of Registered Office Change: ROC

HC's Decision: The Court refused to interfere with the tax authorities’ decision. It was observed that since the core issue of taxability was already under dispute for earlier years, granting a NIL certificate at this stage would effectively pre-judge the matter. The Court emphasised that the Assessing Officer acted reasonably in exercising caution, given the ongoing appellate proceedings. Although the petitioner argued that services performed outside India should not be taxable in India, the Court chose not to rule on this question at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed, and the rejection of the NIL withholding certificate was upheld.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…