High Court Slams Revenue: Refund Cannot Be Withheld Due to CPC Tech Glitch:

High Court Slams Revenue: Refund Cannot Be Withheld Due to CPC Tech Glitch

High Court directs Revenue to manually grant advance tax credit and issue refund noting CPC system’s technical limitations

Delhi HC: Revenue to resolve Landmark Property’s advance tax credit issue manually

authorMeetu KumaridateOct 6, 2025
Last update on Oct 6, 2025
High Court Slams Revenue: Refund Cannot Be Withheld Due to CPC Tech Glitch The petitioner approached the Court seeking relief against the non-grant of credit for the advance tax deposited in the PAN of its predecessor entity following a demerger. As a result, the refund due to the petitioner was not released, and the demands were incorrectly displayed in the CPC system. On 27.08.2025, the Court recorded Revenue’s request for time to resolve the issue. On the next date, the Revenue placed on record an email from the DCIT, Central Circle-1, stating that the Systems Directorate had expressed its technical inability to allow partial credit in such cases through the portal.
"You Can’t Extend TAR Deadline Without Extending ITR Due Date," Gujarat HC Says to CBDT
Main Issue: Whether the Revenue could be directed to manually adjust the petitioner’s advance tax credit and issue a refund, despite CPC’s technical limitations.
Delhi HC Sets Aside Rejection of Condonation for 12-Day Delay in ITR Filing
HC's Decision: The Court noted that the Revenue had already proposed to the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), New Delhi, to allow manual issuance of refund by giving credit of partial advance tax paid on the predecessor’s PAN. It was also proposed to mark the impugned demand as “stayed” to prevent automatic adjustment of future refunds by CPC. Recording this stand, the Court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the Revenue to complete the follow-up action within three weeks. It was clarified that if the issue was not resolved within the said period, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive the petition. Pending applications were dismissed as infructuous. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2161
Up Next

Loading suggestions…