Income Tax Section 154 Cannot Override DTVSV Final Settlement, Holds HC:

High Court quashes rectification holding DTVSV settlement final and bars further proceedings under Section 154.
Form-V Issuance Brings Finality; No Scope For Rectification Proceedings

For the 2017–18 assessment year, taxpayer Sanjay Singh found himself in a dispute after a routine assessment under Section 143(3). To put the matter to rest, he opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas (DTVSV) Act, 2020, a government scheme designed to end tax litigation. He paid the settled amount, and on March 11, 2022, the department issued Form-V, the final certificate confirming the dispute was officially closed.
However, the peace didn't last. Following a later audit objection, the Assessing Officer (AO) tried to use Section 154 to "rectify" the original assessment, essentially trying to dig up a settled grave. Despite the taxpayer’s protests, the AO issued a fresh demand notice in late 2023.
Central Issue: Can the tax department initiate rectification proceedings under Section 154 after a case has been conclusively settled and a Form-V has been issued under the DTVSV Act?
HC's Ruling: The Jharkhand High Court sided firmly with the taxpayer. The Court ruled that the whole point of the DTVSV Act is to provide finality. Once Form-V is issued, the curtain falls on that specific assessment year. The Court clarified that Section 154 cannot be used as a backdoor to reopen or tweak an assessment that has already reached a statutory conclusion. Relying on several legal precedents, the High Court emphasized that the issuance of the settlement certificate signifies a total closure of the dispute. Consequently, the Court quashed the rectification order and the fresh tax demand, allowing the writ petition.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given BelowAbout Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 648-Day Delay After Assessee Lost Family During COVID, Restores AppealPremium
- ITAT Quashes Rs 2 Crore Penalty as Time-Barred; Limitation Starts from AO’s Reference, Not Show-Cause NoticePremium
- ITAT Remands Appeal After Finding NFAC Ignored 89 Pages of Evidence on Cash Deposits and Flat Improvement CostPremium
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity in Rs 2.63 Crore Foreign Bank Credit Addition CasePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition on Explained Demonetisation Cash DepositsPremium
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts










