Income Tax Section 154 Cannot Override DTVSV Final Settlement, Holds HC:

Income Tax Section 154 Cannot Override DTVSV Final Settlement, Holds HC

High Court quashes rectification holding DTVSV settlement final and bars further proceedings under Section 154.

Form-V Issuance Brings Finality; No Scope For Rectification Proceedings

authorMeetu KumaridateApr 10, 2026
Last update on Apr 10, 2026
Income Tax Section 154 Cannot Override DTVSV Final Settlement, Holds HC

For the 2017–18 assessment year, taxpayer Sanjay Singh found himself in a dispute after a routine assessment under Section 143(3). To put the matter to rest, he opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas (DTVSV) Act, 2020, a government scheme designed to end tax litigation. He paid the settled amount, and on March 11, 2022, the department issued Form-V, the final certificate confirming the dispute was officially closed.

High Court Grants Section 80P Exemption despite Belated ITR Filing

However, the peace didn't last. Following a later audit objection, the Assessing Officer (AO) tried to use Section 154 to "rectify" the original assessment, essentially trying to dig up a settled grave. Despite the taxpayer’s protests, the AO issued a fresh demand notice in late 2023.

Central Issue: Can the tax department initiate rectification proceedings under Section 154 after a case has been conclusively settled and a Form-V has been issued under the DTVSV Act?

Delhi Police Uncovers GST Fraud Worth Rs 50 Crore Involving Fake Medicine Racket; Six Arrested

HC's Ruling: The Jharkhand High Court sided firmly with the taxpayer. The Court ruled that the whole point of the DTVSV Act is to provide finality. Once Form-V is issued, the curtain falls on that specific assessment year. The Court clarified that Section 154 cannot be used as a backdoor to reopen or tweak an assessment that has already reached a statutory conclusion. Relying on several legal precedents, the High Court emphasized that the issuance of the settlement certificate signifies a total closure of the dispute. Consequently, the Court quashed the rectification order and the fresh tax demand, allowing the writ petition.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166
Up Next

Loading suggestions…