ITAT Overturns 60.53 Lakh Interest Deduction Disallowance under Section 57:

Tribunal rules that mismatch in borrowing and lending rates alone can't justify disallowance of interest under Section 57.
ITAT Mumbai Allows Full Interest Deduction, Rejects Arbitrary Rate-Based Disallowance

ITAT Overturns 60.53 Lakh Interest Deduction Disallowance under Section 57
The appellant, a partner in two partnership firms, had filed her return for AY 2020–21, declaring interest income and claiming a deduction of Rs. 1.15 crore under Section 57 of the Income Tax Act. In addition to paying interest at a rate of 9.04% on loans totalling more than Rs. 15.83 crore, she also earned an average interest rate of 5.22% on subsequent loans totalling Rs. 22.43 crore. The Assessing Officer rejected Rs. 60.53 lakh of the claimed interest expense, claiming that there was no business rationale for the funds' loan to family members or related entities at lower or no interest.
The assessee explained that lower rates were agreed upon due to the borrowers’ limited financial capacity and that interest cannot be notional. However, the AO limited the deduction to the average earning rate of 5.22%, and the CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, terming the lending practice lacking in business prudence or commercial expediency. Thus, aggrieved by the said decision of the CIT(A), the assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT Mumbai Bench.
Issue Raised: Whether restricting interest deduction under Section 57 based on a differential between borrowing and lending rates, absent any finding of non-business purpose, is justified.
ITAT Mumbai’s Decision: The tribunal held that the assessee had borrowed on interest and also earned interest income, and there was no legal requirement to match borrowing and lending rates exactly. Since the assessee had declared interest income and paid interest wholly for earning that income, disallowance of a portion on the ground of rate difference was not tenable. The AO also failed to prove diversion of funds for non-income-generating purposes. The disallowance of Rs. 60.53 lakh was accordingly deleted.
To Read Judgment, Download PDF Given Below.
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








