ITAT: Payment for Project-Specific Architectural and Consultancy Services Not FTS Sans ‘Make Available’; No TDS Liability

The designs could not be reused for other projects, and no technical knowledge or skills were "made available" to the assessee company for independent use.

Payment for Project-Specific Architectural Not FTS: ITAT

Nidhi | Apr 9, 2026 |

ITAT: Payment for Project-Specific Architectural and Consultancy Services Not FTS Sans ‘Make Available’; No TDS Liability

ITAT: Payment for Project-Specific Architectural and Consultancy Services Not FTS Sans ‘Make Available’; No TDS Liability

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has held that the payment for consultancy and architectural and structural design does not qualify as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under the DTAA, requiring no tax deduction.

The case started when the Assessing Officer claimed that the payments made by the assessee, Forum Homes Private Limited, to two Singapore-based companies for consultancy and architectural and structural design should be treated as FTS under Section 91(vii) of the Income Tax Act, read with Article 12(4) of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). Since the assessee had not deducted tax at source on the payments, the AO made a disallowance of the amount paid under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.

The assessee argued that the services were project-specific and did not transfer any technical knowledge or skill. Further, the consultancy services for the architectural design and drawing will no longer be in use once the project is finished.

The Tribunal agreed with the company’s view, observing that the services were project-specific. Also, the designs could not be reused for other projects, and no technical knowledge or skills were “made available” to the assessee company for independent use. Therefore, the conditions of Article 12(4) of the India-Singapore DTAA were not fulfilled.

The ITAT relied on its earlier decision for the previous year, where a similar issue was decided in favour of the taxpayer. As a result, the Tribunal held that these payments were not FTS and therefore not taxable in India.

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
UAE to Leave OPEC After 60 Years Over Production Restrictions Rules Delhi Department of Trade and Taxes Orders Transfer and Posting of 57 GST Officers Delhi HC Imposes Fine on Firm Due to Fake GST ITC Claim Using Fake Invoices Tata Steel Wins Relief of Over Rs 4,300 crore in Odisha Chromite Mine Case SEBI Imposes Penalty of Rs 1.5 Crore on Eight Entities for Front-Running TradesView All Posts