Once High Court Decides, Lower Authorities Cannot Revisit the Same Issue: ITAT:

ITAT held that once the Gujarat HC quashes an assessment order and directs fresh proceedings, lower authorities cannot re-adjudicate the same matter.
ITAT Quashes CIT(A) Order After Gujarat HC Ruling

Once High Court Decides, Lower Authorities Cannot Revisit the Same Issue: ITAT
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench, held that once a case has been decided by the High Court, lower authorities cannot decide on the same. Therefore, the tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal and quashed the CIT(A)'s order for the Assessment Year 2019-20. The High Court's directions are considered final
In the present case, the assessee had filed an appeal before the Gujarat High Court, challenging the validity of the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO), arguing no proper notice under Section 142(1) of the Act was served before issuing the final directions.
When the high court analysed the case, it noted that the assessee was granted a proper opportunity of hearing during the assessment proceedings, which reflects an explicit violation of the principles of natural justice. Considering the same, the high court quashed the impugned assessment order dated March 21, 2024, passed under Section 147/144B of the Act, through an order dated October 16, 2025. Therefore, the related demand notice dated March 21, 2024, issued under Section 156 of the Act was also set aside. The case was sent back to the tax authorities for fresh consideration.
Despite the challenged assessment order dated March 21, 2024, being quashed by the Gujarat High Court, the CIT(A) decided to hear the case and after hearing the case, quashed the impugned assessment order on a different ground, holding that the reopening of the assessment was invalid.
Being aggrieved with the CIT(A)'s order, the income tax authorities approached the ITAT Ahmedabad. The Tribunal observed that once the High Court had already quashed the initial assessment order, there was no valid reason left for the CIT(A) to decide on the same case which had already been decided. Therefore, the tribunal quashed the CIT(A)'s order and allowed the tax authorities' appeal. Now, the tax authorities have been directed to proceed with the fresh assessment as instructed by the High Court.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2389My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands Section 69 Unexplained Cash Credit Addition After Bank Statement Was Not ExaminedPremium
- ITAT Remands Transfer Pricing Dispute: DRP to Reassess Comparables and Working Capital AdjustmentPremium
- CBDT Notifies TDS Exemption on Aircraft Lease Payments to IFSC Units Under 20-Year Tax Deduction Scheme Premium
- CBDT Grants TDS Exemption On Ship Leasing Payments To IFSC Units Under 20-Year Tax Deduction SchemePremium
- ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) After Admitting Crucial Sale Deed as Additional Evidence
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








