ITAT Quashes CIT(A) Order for Denying Legal Heir Opportunity, Directs Fresh Adjudication

ITAT quashes the CIT(A) order because the legal heir was not given a proper opportunity of hearing after the taxpayer's death and to submit all the necessary documents.

Legal Heir Not Given Proper Opportunity of Hearing After Taxpayer's Death

Saloni Kumari | Nov 27, 2025 |

ITAT Quashes CIT(A) Order for Denying Legal Heir Opportunity, Directs Fresh Adjudication

ITAT Quashes CIT(A) Order for Denying Legal Heir Opportunity, Directs Fresh Adjudication

ITAT quashed the CIT(A) order on the grounds that the legal heir after the death of the taxpayer was not given a proper chance to participate and to submit all the necessary documents before the authority. Hence, directed CIT(A) to freshly adjudicate the case after the heir submits the necessary documents. The appeal has been allowed for statistical purposes.

The appeal had been filed by Giridhar Gopal Thakur against the income tax department in ITAT Pune, challenging an order passed by the CIT(A)/NFAC on August 29, 2025. The case is related to the assessment year 2013-14, originated from an assessment order passed on November 23, 2017.

The taxpayer declared his income at Rs. 1.21 lakh while furnishing his return, while the assessing officer (AO) made additions to the income of the taxpayer and assessed the total income of the taxpayer at Rs. 25.75 lakh.

When the tribunal heard the arguments of both sides, it noted that the CIT(A) had passed an order on August 21, 2025, addressed to the taxpayer; however, the representative of Revenue highlighted the fact that the taxpayer had passed on February 25, 2022. A paper book was furnished by the taxpayer, costing the copy of the Death Certificate and a copy of the order of the Hon’ble Joint Civil Judge, Panvel, passed on August 22, 2025. In Form No. 36, the name of the legal heir was recorded.

However, the CIT(A) announced its final decision without including the legal heir in the record. Considering the fact, the tribunal quashed the order of CIT(A) for being a de novo adjudication. The legal heir was not given a fair opportunity to file necessary documents; hence, the tribunal directed the CIT(A) to give the heir a fair opportunity to furnish all necessary documents before the ld.CIT(A) and thereafter issue a fresh order on merits. Thus, the appeal has been allowed for statistical purposes.

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"


Tags: ITAT Pune


Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ICAI Announces Cancellation of COPs for 1,211 Chartered Accountants ICAI Removes 73 CAs from Register of Members on Account of Their Death SEBI Introduces “Significant Indices” Framework under SEBI (Index Providers) Regulations, 2024 ICAI Removes 13 Chartered Accountants from Membership Register on Their Requests ICAI Removes 4,337 CAs from Register Over Non-Payment of Membership FeesView All Posts