ITAT quashes CPC disallowance of delayed PF/ESI contributions made under Section 143(1):

ITAT quashes CPC disallowance of delayed PF/ESI contributions made under Section 143(1)

Adjustment under Section 36(1)(va) held beyond scope of summary processing when issue was debatable at relevant time

Adjustment under Section 36(1)(va) held beyond scope of summary processing when issue was debatable at relevant time

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 1, 2026
Last update on Feb 1, 2026
ITAT quashes CPC disallowance of delayed PF/ESI contributions made under Section 143(1) The assessee, a private limited company, filed its return of income for AY 2019-20, which was processed by the CPC under Section 143(1). While issuing the intimation, the CPC made an adjustment of Rs. 5,51,903 by disallowing employees’ contribution towards PF and ESI under Section 36(1)(va) on the ground that the amounts were deposited beyond the due dates prescribed under the respective welfare statutes, though admittedly paid before the due date of filing the return under Section 139(1). The assessee challenged the adjustment, contending that such a disallowance was beyond the scope of Section 143(1) and that no speaking order was passed.
Supreme Court Issues Notice on Delayed Employees’ PF/ESI Deduction Dispute
The NFAC upheld the adjustment by relying on the Supreme Court decision in Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd.. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Tribunal. Main Issue: Whether the disallowance of employees’ contribution to PF and ESI under Section 36(1)(va) could be validly made through an adjustment while processing the return under Section 143(1), when the issue was debatable on the date of intimation.
Supreme Court Issues Notice on Delayed Employees’ PF/ESI Deduction Dispute
ITAT Ruled: The Tribunal held that, at the time when the CPC issued the intimation under Section 143(1), the issue relating to allowability of delayed employees’ contribution to PF/ESI was highly debatable, with conflicting High Court decisions holding the field. It observed that the Supreme Court ruling in Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. was delivered subsequently and arose from a regular assessment under Section 143(3), not from summary processing under Section 143(1). The Tribunal held that such a debatable issue could not be resolved through a prima facie adjustment under Section 143(1). Therefore, the disallowance of Rs. 5,51,903 and the NFAC order affirming it were set aside, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2165
Up Next

Loading suggestions…