Student’s Visa-Related Bank Deposits Can’t Be Taxed as Unexplained Cash Credit: ITAT Surat:

Section 68 addition deleted where temporary deposits by family were fully explained and promptly returned
ITAT Surat deletes Section 68 addition on student’s bank deposits made for visa purpose

Student’s Visa-Related Bank Deposits Can’t Be Taxed as Unexplained Cash Credit: ITAT Surat
The assessee, a student during AY 2010-11, had not originally filed his return of income. Based on information that cash deposits aggregating to Rs. 11.40 lakh were made in his SBI savings account, reassessment proceedings were initiated under Section 148. In response, the assessee filed a return declaring modest income from tuition activity.
During reassessment, the Assessing Officer treated the entire cash deposits as unexplained under Section 68, solely on the basis of bank entries, and completed the assessment by making an addition of Rs. 11.40 lakh. The assessee explained that the deposits were temporary amounts placed by his parents and close relatives only to demonstrate financial capacity for obtaining a student visa, and that the amounts were withdrawn and returned within a short span. The CIT(A) still upheld the addition.
Main Issue: Whether cash deposits made in a student’s bank account, explained as temporary funds provided by family members for visa purposes and subsequently returned, can be treated as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 in the absence of books of account.
ITAT's Order: The ITAT held that the addition under Section 68 was unsustainable on both facts and law. The Tribunal noted that the assessee was a student, maintained no books of account, and the addition was made only based on bank statements. The explanation offered, that the deposits were temporary funds from parents and close relatives for visa requirements, was found to be plausible and supported by details showing matching withdrawals and repayments within a short period.
As the Revenue failed to bring any material to disprove the genuineness of these transactions or to show that the deposits represented the assessee’s own income, the Tribunal deleted the entire addition of Rs. 11.40 lakh. The appeal was accordingly allowed.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2160My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Additions After Ex-Army Personnel Explains Bank Credits with EvidencePremium
- ITAT Allows Section 80P Deduction on Interest Earned from Co-operative Bank DepositsPremium
- ITAT Quashes Consequential Assessment After Section 263 Revision Order FailsPremium
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








