ITAT Quashes Reassessment for AY 2012-13, Cites Defective Reasons for Reopening:

ITAT Quashes Reassessment for AY 2012-13, Cites Defective Reasons for Reopening

ITAT quashes AY 2012-13 reassessment, ruling that the reopening under Sections 147/148 was based on defective reasons and lacked proper application of mind.

ITAT Sets Aside Reassessment Under Sections 147 and 148

authorVanshika vermadateJun 6, 2026
Last update on Jun 6, 2026
ITAT Quashes Reassessment for AY 2012-13, Cites Defective Reasons for Reopening The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside the reassessment proceedings initiated against assessee Manujendra Shah for AY 2012-13.
ITAT Restricts Bogus Purchase Addition to Profit Element Only
The dispute began from a reassessment order passed by the AO u/s 147 & 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The reopening assessment has been challenged by the taxpayer, and it has been argued that the reasons recorded by the AO are legally defective and show a lack of proper application of mind. During the hearing, the assessee relied on the fact that a similar issue had already been adjudicated by the Delhi High Court in the taxpayer’s own case for the immediately preceding year, AY 2011-12. In this case, the High Court had noted that the assessing officer had not made a proper investigation of relevant facts and legal provisions before reopening the assessment. The court observed that the officer had not procured the material regarding the valuation of the land as of 1st April 1981, which was necessary to ascertain the cost of acquisition. The Tribunal has observed that the reasons recorded for reopening of the assessment for AY 2012-13 are materially the same as those considered by the High Court for AY 2011-12. Since the defects highlighted by the High Court were equally present in the current year, the Tribunal found merit in the taxpayer's objection.
ITAT Directs TP Reassessment And Holds Only AE Transactions Can Be Benchmarked for ALP Determination
Consequently, the ITAT held that the assumption of jurisdiction under sections 147 and 148 was invalid. Therefore, the reassessment order passed by the tax department was held to be invalid and was quashed. Thus, the tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee.

About Author

LinkedIn

Vanshika verma

Content Writer

Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1587
Up Next

Loading suggestions…