ITAT Remanded Rs 5.26 Crore Cash Deposit of Demonetisation for Fresh Adjudication:

ITAT Remanded Rs 5.26 Crore Cash Deposit of Demonetisation for Fresh Adjudication

Revenue cannot make addition in the hands of a partnership firm based on an impounded order book when the partner has already offered individual business income under presumptive taxation.

Deleted the Section 69A Addition of Rs. 9.05 Lakh

authorSaloni KumaridateMay 27, 2026
Last update on May 27, 2026
ITAT Remanded Rs 5.26 Crore Cash Deposit of Demonetisation for Fresh Adjudication ITAT Delhi has removed the addition of Rs 9.05 Lakh that was made under Section 69A of the Income tax Act against a partnership firm and ruled that an addition under Section 69A of unaccounted cash is not sustainable if the material which is seized belongs to the partner of the partnership firm separately.
ITAT Deletes Income Tax penalty against incorrect HRA Exemption
The assessee is a partnership firm and during a survey under Section 133A, the officials found that there is no active stock or any current business activity but only impounded a handwritten order book that contained cash entries calculating up to Rs 9.05 lakh for the financial year 2017-18 and this money was added as unaccounted cash under Section 69A of the Act.
ROC Imposes Penalty for Duplicate DIN Despite Alleged MCA System Error
The assessee filed its return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 declaring the income of Rs 7.97 lakh but the AO scrutinised that the assessee had deposited Rs 5.28 crore in the form of old currency notes during demonetization and it is unexplained money under Section 68 r.w.s. 115BE of the Act.
Books Can Not Be Rejected on Surmise: ITAT Ahmedabad Grants Complete Relief to Shakti Polyweave
The Tribunal in ITA No. 909/Del/2025 set aside the order of the CIT(A) and directed the AO to conduct a fresh adjudication and give the assessee the opportunity to be heard and submit any further evidence while allowing the appeal. The Tribunal in ITA No. 908/Del/2025, after assessing the facts and circumstances, held that the impounded book belongs to Mrs Rita Bagga personally for her business and not to the firm and thus held that the addition of Rs 9.05 lakh by the AO under Section 69A was not sustainable and deleted the entire addition while allowing the appeal.

About Author

Saloni Kumari

Content Writer

Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2390
Up Next

Loading suggestions…