ITAT Restores 12AB and 80G to Trust After Finding No Commercial Activity

Tribunal finds rejection based on isolated trust deed clauses unsustainable; remands for de novo decision

Dominant Purpose Test Prevails: ITAT Backs Charitable Trust’s Claim

Meetu Kumari | Jun 25, 2025 |

ITAT Restores 12AB and 80G to Trust After Finding No Commercial Activity

ITAT Restores 12AB and 80G to Trust After Finding No Commercial Activity

Registered under the Gujarat Public Trusts Act, 1950, the assessee is involved in educational and charitable activities. The Trust received provisional registration under Section 12AB of the Income-tax Act on 24.03.2023. Later, on 03.01.2024, it applied for regular registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) through Form 10AB. However, both applications were rejected by the CIT (E). The CIT(E) cited Object Nos. 4 and 7 of the trust deed, which mentioned development projects such as roads and drainage, as well as the implementation of government programs, believing they were commercial in nature. The Section 80G application was rejected solely due to the denial of registration under Section 12AB.

Issue Raised: Whether the rejection of registration under Section 12AB and consequent denial of approval under Section 80G can be sustained when based only on a selective reading of certain object clauses in the trust deed, without any finding of actual commercial activity or misuse of funds.

ITAT’s Decision: The Hon’ble ITAT set aside both impugned orders passed by the CIT(E) and remanded the matters back for fresh consideration. The Tribunal held that the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the applications merely based on two object clauses without examining the trust deed as a whole or verifying if any activity under those clauses had actually been undertaken. It noted that the conclusion of possible commercial activity was speculative and that there was no evidence of a relationship between the financial statements and the objected clauses. The tribunal stressed that concerns about potential future misuse cannot be grounds for denying registration under Section 12AB; if they do, they may be considered during Section 13 assessment.

The tribunal restored both applications to the CIT(E) to examine the submissions afresh, avoid premature conclusions, and provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
PCIT’s Section 263 revision quashed where AO had made due enquiries on alleged bogus purchases Delhi HC awards 6% interest on VAT refund delayed by over 15 years Delhi HC sets aside GST order passed without proper service of show cause notice CBI Court Sentences Three to 3 Years’ Jail in Rs. 1.18 Crore Excise Duty Rebate Fraud ED arrests former RCOM Director Punit Garg in Rs. 40,000 crore bank fraud probeView All Posts