ITAT Restores Charitable Exemption Claims and Deletes Section 271D Penalty for Educational Society:

Procedural delays in filing audit reports due to COVID-19 should not result in the denial of genuine charitable exemptions, rules ITAT.
ITAT: Condonation of Audit Report Delay for Charitable Trust

ITAT Restores Charitable Exemption Claims and Deletes Section 271D Penalty for Educational Society
Ravi Rishi Educational Society, an institution registered under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, faced a significant tax demand after the Central Processing Centre (CPC) denied its exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 for the Assessment Years 2019-20 and 2020-21.
The denial was based on the technical ground that the society had failed to file its mandatory audit reports in Form 10B/10BB within the prescribed time limits. For AY 2017-18, the society was further penalised under Section 271D for allegedly receiving cash in lieu of sale consideration for agricultural land, in violation of Section 269SS.
Main Issue: Whether the delay in filing Form 10B/10BB, largely attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic, justifies the total denial of charitable exemptions and the taxation of gross receipts. Whether a penalty is legally sustainable if the Assessing Officer fails to record satisfaction for its initiation in the original assessment order.
ITAT's Order: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad Bench, ruled in favor of the assessee on both major counts. The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the audit reports, noting that the majority of the delay occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic and was not intentional.
The Bench remanded the matter to the AO to decide the exemption claims afresh following the outcome of the society's condonation application before the CBDT/Pr. CIT.
The ITAT held that even if exemptions were denied, only the surplus/profit should be taxed as an Association of Persons (AOP), rather than the entire gross receipts. The Tribunal quashed the levy of penalty, observing that recording satisfaction in the assessment order is a "mandatory" prerequisite for initiating penalty proceedings, which the AO had failed to fulfill.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2264My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 302-Day Delay, Restores Salary Assessment for Fresh VerificationPremium
- ITAT Condones Delay After Tax Consultant's Death, Restores Appeals for Fresh HearingPremium
- ITAT Remands Salary Addition, Says Taxability Depends on Salary Becoming Due, Not Mere ReceiptPremium
- ITAT Deletes TP Royalty Adjustment, Orders Fresh Review of Commission BenchmarkingPremium
- ITAT Quashes Reassessment Over Unsigned Section 148 Notice Issued to AssesseePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








