ITAT: Validates Cash Deposits During Demonetisation Sourced From Assessee’s Deceased Mother; Deletes Sec. 69A Addition:

The Tribunal deletes Rs 6.70 lakh Sec. 69A addition, accepting assessee’s explanation that demonetisation cash deposits were from wedding funds and deceased mother’s savings.
ITAT Deletes Unexplained Cash Addition

ITAT: Validates Cash Deposits During Demonetisation Sourced From Assessee’s Deceased Mother; Deletes Sec. 69A Addition
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed an appeal filed by Jamshed Naval Karanjia against the Commissioner of Income Tax for Assessment Year 2017-18 and deleted an addition of Rs 6.70 lakh made in respect of cash deposits during the demonetisation period.
Background of the case
The case originated after the Income Tax Department, under "Operation Clean Money", identified cash deposits of Rs 14 lakh made during the demonetisation period. Since no return of income was filed and notices were allegedly not complied with, the Assessing Officer passed an order under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act and treated the deposits as unexplained income under Section 69A. During the course of appellate proceedings, the additions were restricted to Rs 6,70,000 as the assessee could not prove the nature of the cash deposit.
The assessee explained that he had travelled to India in 2016 to attend his daughter’s wedding. He had brought funds from Canada for wedding expenses, and the unspent amount, along with cash gifts received during the wedding, was deposited into the bank account. It was also submitted that part of the money represented savings of his late mother, which were handed over by his brother after her death. An affidavit was filed in support of this explanation.
After examining the records, the Tribunal observed that the explanation was supported by an affidavit and the Revenue failed to effectively disprove it. Considering the overall facts and family circumstances, the Tribunal held that the explanation could not be rejected merely on suspicion.
Accordingly, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs 6.70 lakh made under Section 69A read with Section 115BBE and allowed the appeal in favour of the assessee.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1985My Recent Articles
- Vikran Engineering Receives Rs 1.55 Crore GST Notice Including Rs 83.62 Lakh Tax Demand, Interest and Penalty
- Fire Officer Allegedly Demanded Rs 3 Lakh for School NOC, Caught Accepting Rs 1 Lakh in Lokayukta Trap
- Telangana GST Fraud: CGST Unearths Rs 5.68 Crore Tax Evasion Through Alleged Fake SEZ Registration, Proprietor Arrested
- Mahadev Betting Case: CBI Arrests Key Accused Abhishek Kumar After UAE Deportation, ED Flags Rs 94,000 Crore Illegal Money Trail
- Court Allows 7 Arrested Foreigners To Travel Abroad For A Month To Meet Their Families
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Tags
Recent Posts
All Posts








