ITR Delay Condoned: Karnataka High Court Protects Trust's Legitimate Tax Exemption Rights:

The Karnataka High Court ruled that genuine tax exemption claims should not be denied due to technical errors, condoning the delay in filing the ITR for AY 2017-18.
HC Upholds Substantive Benefit Over Procedural Delay

ITR Delay Condoned: Karnataka High Court Protects Trust's Legitimate Tax Exemption Rights
The Karnataka High Court held that technical issues and errors should not prevent a genuine benefit, especially when a similar relief has already been granted in earlier years. Consequently, the delay in filing ITR for AY 2017-18 is condoned.
The tax authorities had denied the petitioner's request seeking condonation of the delay in filing the income tax return (ITR) for the assessment year 2017-18, vide an order dated October 27, 2025.
The petitioner claimed that during filing its income tax return (ITR) for the AY 2017-18, it had mistakenly claimed exemption under a different provision of Section 10(23C)(iv) of the Act; however, being a recognised PF trust, its income is exempt under Section 10(25) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This led to a significant delay in filing. The petitioner further claimed that the mistake was not intentional; however, the tax department still denied its request for condonation of delay.
The petitioner highlighted that similar situations have already occurred in AY 2021-22 and 2023-24, where the department had condoned the delay in filing returns by exercising its power. Further pointed out that denying the Section 10(23C)(iv) exemption for AY 2017-18 will cause a significant loss of trust.
When the court heard the case, it noted that although there was a delay, the trust had a valid claim for exemption under Section 10(23C)(iv) of the Act. The court highlighted that technical errors should not prevent taxpayers from claiming genuine benefits, especially when similar relief had already been granted in earlier years.
Considering the same, the court set aside the impugned order dated October 27, 2025, and condoned the delay caused in filing the return, ruling in favour of the petitioner. The tax authorities are directed to process the return in accordance with the law.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2420My Recent Articles
- Bona Fide Mistake in ITR Cannot Deny Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer a Final Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.27 Crore Cash Deposits Under Section 69APremium
- ITAT Restores Appeals for Fresh Consideration After NFAC Denied Request of Personal Hearing Through Video ConferencingPremium
- ITAT Condones 97-Day Delay, Restores Appeal After CIT(A) Sent Hearing Notices to Wrong Email AddressPremium
- MCA Appoints Justice (Retd.) Yogesh Khanna as Officiating Chairperson of NCLAT for Three Months
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








