Loose Papers Can’t Sustain Tax Additions: ITAT Gives Major Relief to Land Developer

Tribunal rules that unshared third-party statements and mere suspicion cannot justify taxing genuine share capital and call money

Tribunal rules that surrendered cash from land dealings is regular business income

Meetu Kumari | Nov 23, 2025 |

Loose Papers Can’t Sustain Tax Additions: ITAT Gives Major Relief to Land Developer

Loose Papers Can’t Sustain Tax Additions: ITAT Gives Major Relief to Land Developer

Madanlal Lalchand Jain, a land developer from Nandurbar, was covered in a December 2021 search conducted in the “Dream Group & Land Developers” operation. Based on several loose sheets, excel extracts and handwritten notings found during the search, the Assessing Officer made large additions under sections 68, 69B, 69C and 69A across AY 2021-22 and AY 2022-23. The assessee stated that all cash noted on various seized sheets represented his own business income from real estate dealings, which he had already offered in his profit and loss account.  He also explained the capital-gains enhancement which was based only on an uncorroborated third-party statement.

Appeal to CIT(A): The CIT(A) deleted some additions but upheld those under section 68 and the enhanced capital gains. Both sides approached the Tribunal.

Issues Raised: Whether additions made solely on loose papers, unsigned sheets, cancelled notings, and unverified third-party statements can be sustained, and whether the cash recorded on seized documents already added as business income, could be taxed again under section 68 read with section 115BBE.

ITAT Ruled: The Tribunal held that the assessee’s additional income declared during the search arose from his real-estate business and was rightly offered as business income in the profit and loss account. Since no material indicated any other activity, taxing it again under section 68 r.w.s. 115BBE was unjustified. Loose papers found during search must be read as a whole; they cannot be selectively accepted or rejected. Documents that were unsigned, undated, or contradicted by surrounding facts were treated as “dumb documents” incapable of sustaining additions.

The Hon’ble tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s deletion of additions under sections 69B and 69C. Therefore, the Tribunal deleted the capital-gain enhancement of Rs. 37.74 lakh based on an untested third-party statement and the Rs. 38 lakh addition for AY 2022-23 founded on a cancelled sheet.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ITAT Ahmedabad deletes major TP additions, limits R&D deduction to DSIR approval PCIT’s Section 263 revision quashed where AO had made due enquiries on alleged bogus purchases Delhi HC awards 6% interest on VAT refund delayed by over 15 years Delhi HC sets aside GST order passed without proper service of show cause notice CBI Court Sentences Three to 3 Years’ Jail in Rs. 1.18 Crore Excise Duty Rebate FraudView All Posts