National Stock Exchange Faces Penalty for Not Reconstituting Nomination and Remuneration Committee:

The stock exchange requested the ROC to waive the penalty, claiming that the situation was out of its control as the company had not received approval from SEBI on time.
ROC Levies Penalty on NSE for Not Reconstituting NRC

National Stock Exchange Faces Penalty for Not Reconstituting Nomination and Remuneration Committee
The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Mumbai, has passed an adjudication penalty order under section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, against the National Stock Exchange and its directors for violating section 178(8) of the Companies Act, 2013.
The matter is related to the NSE's failure to properly re-constitutes its Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC), violating the provisions of Section 178 of the Companies Act.
Section 178(1) of the Companies Act mandates that the Board of Directors of every listed public company must constitute a Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC). This committee should have at least three non-executive directors, with at least half being independent directors. As per this section, the company's chairperson can be a member of the committee but cannot chair it.
NSE had accepted its default by filing a Suo-Moto Adjudication Application informing that it did not re-constitute the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, chaired by a PID (Public Interest Director), after the tenure of its earlier members had ended.
NSE informed that it had applied to SEBI for approval to appoint new Public Interest Directors, but the approval was received around one year after submitting the application. As a result, the NRC was not properly formed until 02.05.2024.
The stock exchange requested the ROC to waive the penalty, claiming that the situation was out of its control as the company had not received approval from SEBI on time.
However, the ROC held the company and its directors liable to pay a penalty under Section 178(8) of the Companies Act. The ROC levied a penalty of Rs 5,00,000 on the NSE and Rs 1,00,000 each on its three directors. The penalty imposed on the directors was required to be paid through their own personal sources.
The ROC directed the company's officers in default to correct the default and pay the penalty amount within 90 days through the 'e-Adjudication' facility on the MCA Portal.
About Author

Nidhi
Content Writer
Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833My Recent Articles
- Karnataka High Court Gives Another Chance in GST Matter Due to Lack of Hearing
- Delay Should Be Condoned if Explanation is Unrefuted: ITAT
- Non-Service of Income Tax Notice, Ill health of taxpayer, ITAT condones Appeal filing delay
- Books of Accounts Cannot be Rejected Without Any Specific Defect: ITAT Kolkata
- Karnataka High Court Sends ITC Matter Back to GST Authorities for Reconsideration
Up Next
Loading suggestions…









