No Obligation to Check GST Portal After Cancellation; Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Orders:

The Allahabad High Court quashed GST orders and an attachment order issued after cancellation of registration, holding that failure to properly serve notice violated principles of natural justice.
GST Proceedings Without Proper Service Invalid: HC

No Obligation to Check GST Portal After Cancellation; Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Orders
The Allahabad High Court quashed GST orders against the petitioner, holding that he was not required to check the portal after GST cancellation. Issuing notice only online without proper service violated natural justice principles.
The writ petition has been filed by Mohd. Istiyaq in the Allahabad High Court, challenging orders dated August 23, 2024; a notice dated May 29, 2024; and an attachment order dated November 04, 2025, passed by the GST Authorities. The GST number of the petitioner was cancelled on September 04, 2019. After that, no business was carried out by him. However, after the GST cancellation date, a show cause notice (SCN) was issued to the petitioner on the GST portal, and subsequently, an order was passed under Section 74 of the Act.
The aggrieved petitioner approached the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner raised a key argument that once the GST number was cancelled, he was not compelled to check the GST portal. Further argued that the show cause notice must be sent to the petitioner using other available methods of service. In support of these claims, the petitioner also cited an earlier judgement of the same court in the case titled M/s Katyal Industries vs. State of U.P. and others.
When the court analysed the facts of the case, it noted that the impugned order was issued online without proper service and without hearing the petitioner, which is an explicit violation of the principles of natural justice. Accordingly, the court quashed the impugned orders dated August 23, 2024, the notice dated May 29, 2024, and an attachment order dated November 04, 2025. However, the department is allowed to issue proper notice addressed to the petitioner in adherence with the law.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2612My Recent Articles
- ROC Penalises Nidhi Company and Five Directors for Failure to Furnish PAN and Email IDs of Allottees in Form PAS-Premium
- SBI Revises Cash Withdrawal Charges on Basic Savings Bank Deposit Accounts; Effective from October 1
- Delhi High Court Allows SC and HC Judges to File or Revise ITR Under New Regime Without Listing Certain AllowancesPremium
- ROC Penalises Company and Directors for Not Mentioning DINs of Directors on AOC-4 Forms Balance SheetsPremium
- Substantial Justice Prevails Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 171-Day Delay in Section 54 Exemption Dispute Due to Ill HealthPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







