Penalty Order Passed by ROC Chennai for Non-Disclosure in Form PAS-3:

Penalty Order Passed by ROC Chennai for Non-Disclosure in Form PAS-3

Sri Muthu Malai Benefit Fund Limited and its officer Gomathi Santhi were penalised by the ROC Chennai for non-disclosure of allottees’ occupations in Form PAS-3, in violation of Rule 12(2) of the Companies Rules, 2014.

Violation of Rule 12(2) under Companies Act, 2013

authorKhushi JaindateMay 15, 2026
Last update on May 15, 2026
The order issued by the Registrar of Companies (ROC), Chennai, concerns non-compliance by Sri Muthu Malai Benefit Fund Limited and its officer, Gomathi Santhi, under the Companies Act, 2013. The company had filed Form PAS-3 in 2018 for the allotment of shares. Still, it failed to disclose the occupations of certain allottees, which is mandatory under Rule 12(2) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014.
Mere production of invoices, ledger extracts, and banking transactions not sufficient to stablish Valid Purchase: ITAT
Although notices and opportunities to be heard were provided by the ROC, the company and the officer failed to appear, resulting in the matter being decided ex parte. Consequently, the ROC imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000 on the company and Rs. 10,000 on the officer in default
From Rs. 275 Crore to Zero: United Breweries Gets Relief in Sales Tax Dispute
The order also directs them to rectify the filing defect and pay the penalty within 90 days. The officer must pay the penalty personally and cannot recover it from the company. Further, the parties have the right to appeal before the Regional Director, Chennai, within 60 days from the date of the order.

About Author

LinkedIn

Khushi Jain

Legal Content Writer

StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
80
Up Next

Loading suggestions…