Penalty Revoked: RD Sets Aside ROC Fine Over Secretarial Standards Compliance:

RD has revoked the penalty of Rs. 120,000 imposed on the company and its three directors, considering the 2017 amendment in Secretarial Standards (SS-1).
Penalty Revoked as SS-1 Amendment Removes Disclosure Requirement

Penalty Revoked: RD Sets Aside ROC Fine Over Secretarial Standards Compliance
Recently, the Regional Director (RD) has revoked the penalty of Rs. 120,000 imposed on Stanley Oem Sofas Limited and its three directors, as the requirement of disclosing the no and dates of meetings of the Board and committees held during the financial year has been removed after the 2017 amendment in Secretarial Standards (SS-1).
Stanley Oem Sofas Limited, based in Bengaluru, Karnataka, along with its three directors (Appellant), had filed an appeal dated 27.05.2025 under section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, using e-form ADJ (SRN AB4266128), before the Regional Director (South East Region) of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), Hyderabad, and was challenging an adjudication order (F.No. ROCB/Adj.454-118(10)/Stanley OEM Sofas/Co.No.084973/2025/6686 to 6689) dated 23.03.2025, issued by the Registrar of Companies (ROC), Bangalore, under Section 454(5) and Section 118(10) of the Companies Act, 2013.
The ROC's order dated 23.03.2025 was penalising the company and its three directors under Section 118(11) of the Act for violation of Section 118(10) of the Companies Act, 2013. The order was issued after hearing Mr. Vamsikrishna K. and Mr. Vinu Thomas, practising company secretaries, on 06.03.2025, confirming the penalty amount, as mentioned below:
- Stanley OEM Sofas Ltd. was fined Rs. 75,000 (Rs. 25,000 for each year of default).
- Each of the three directors was fined Rs. 15,000 (Rs. 5,000 per year), totalling Rs. 45,000 for all directors.
- Total penalty imposed: Rs. 120,000 (Rs. 75,000 + Rs. 45,000)
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2504My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Rs 70 Lakh Penalty, Says Genuine ITR Clerical Error Is Not Misreporting of Income
- Who Needs to File ITR by July 31? Check Eligibility, Due Dates, and Extension Update
- ITR Filing Deadline 2026: July 31 or August 31? Know Who Can File Income Tax Return by Which Date
- ITAT Sets Aside Ex Parte Assessment, Orders Fresh Hearing With Notices on Both Departmental and Form 36 Email IDsPremium
- CBDT Issues Guidance Note on Crypto-Asset Reporting Under Income Tax Act, 2025
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








