RBI Issues Final Amendment Framework on Lending to Related Parties; Effective April 2026:

RBI has notified a revised related party lending framework, effective April 1, 2026, to strengthen governance, improve clarity, and align definitions with the Companies Act and IBC.
RBI Aligns Related Party Lending Rules with Companies Act and IBC

RBI Issues Final Amendment Framework on Lending to Related Parties; Effective April 2026
The Central Bank of India, RBI (Reserve Bank of India), has released final amendment directions on lending to related parties by regulated entities. This revised framework is scheduled to take effect from April 01, 2026. The action will significantly enhance the definition of related parties, related persons, control, promoters, and key managerial personnel, aligning them with the Companies Act and IBC.
Using these directions, RBI has introduced significant amendments to the Reserve Bank of India (Non-Banking Financial Companies - Credit Risk Management) - Directions, 2025. The Central bank has taken this action in exercise of its powers granted under 45JA, 45L, and 45M of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; Sections 30A and 32 of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987; Section 6 of the Factoring Regulation Act, 2011; and all other provisions/laws.
The directions aim to make the rules for lending by regulated entities (REs) like banks, NBFCs, cooperative banks, and national financial institutions clearer, more consistent, and easier to adhere to.
In the revised framework, RBI has excluded equity investments in related parties, despite investments in debt instruments still being covered. NBFCs that do not accept government funds and do not possess a customer interface, as well as Core Investment Companies that largely lend within their group, have been exempted by the RBI.
No amendments have been introduced to the existing prohibitions on lending by all-India financial institutions to directors and related entities. The amended framework has substituted the term “senior officer” with “specified employee,” and the word “substantial interest” has been replaced with “significant influence and control.”
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…








