Received CPC Intimation Asking to File Form 29B? Here is What to Do

Several companies have recently received system-generated intimations from the Income Tax Department's <a href="https://studycafe.in/itat-cpc-cannot-disallow-employees-pf-esi-contributions-under-section-1431-402682.html">Central Processing Centre</a> (CPC) asking them to submit Form 29B. In the message, the taxpayers have been warned that if they do not submit this form, their deductions will be disallowed.

If you have also received such intimation from CPC, then there is no need to panic. The message may sound serious, but it does not always mean that there is a mistake in your return. Let us understand what you should do.

<div class="related-article-inline">Also Read<a href="/cpc-wrongly-levies-section-234b-interest-demand-on-itr-u-filers-causing-unjust-taxpayer-harassment-404070.html" class="related-link">CPC Wrongly Levies Section 234B Interest Demand on ITR-U Filers, Causing Unjust Taxpayer Harassment</a></div>

In most cases, these intimations are sent by the automated processing system. The system often flags<a href="https://studycafe.in/erroneous-form-29b-demand-notices-system-glitch-triggers-mat-notices-for-non-mat-companies-404058.html"> Form 29B</a> as missing without checking if the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions were applicable to the company for that year.

Form 29B is required only when a company is liable to pay tax under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. It is a mandatory report used by the company to disclose its "book profits" for determining MAT Liability. If the tax payable under the normal provision is higher than the MAT liability, MAT does not apply, and filing Form 29B is not mandatory. In that case, even if the taxpayers do not file Form 29B, it does not mean they have violated the provisions of Section 115JB(4) of the Income Tax Act.

<iframe title="Embedded post" src="https://www.linkedin.com/embed/feed/update/urn:li:ugcPost:7415021100952252416?collapsed=1" width="504" height="567" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>

If you get such intimation, make sure you reply to it within the specified time. In your response, clarify that Form No. 29B under Section 115JB(4) was not mandatory to be filed because the tax liability under the normal provision was more than the MAT liability.

<div class="related-article-inline">Also Read<a href="/aware-of-income-tax-calculator-know-how-to-use-it-for-smart-investment-and-financial-planning-405821.html" class="related-link">Aware of Income Tax Calculator? Know How to Use It for Smart Investment and Financial Planning</a></div>

Once this response is submitted along with the supported explanation, the CPC usually drops the proposed adjustments without any further penalty or consequences. If the issue is still not solved, you can opt for the reprocessing of your <a href="https://studycafe.in/itr-refund-here-is-why-income-tax-dept-may-take-one-year-to-release-your-refund-405790.html">ITR</a>.

Received CPC Intimation Asking to File Form 29B? Here is What to Do

Several companies have recently received system-generated intimations from the Income Tax Department's <a href="https://studycafe.in/itat-cpc-cannot-disallow-employees-pf-esi-contributions-under-section-1431-402682.html">Central Processing Centre</a> (CPC) asking them to submit Form 29B. In the message, the taxpayers have been warned that if they do not submit this form, their deductions will be disallowed.

If you have also received such intimation from CPC, then there is no need to panic. The message may sound serious, but it does not always mean that there is a mistake in your return. Let us understand what you should do.

[related id="404070"]

In most cases, these intimations are sent by the automated processing system. The system often flags<a href="https://studycafe.in/erroneous-form-29b-demand-notices-system-glitch-triggers-mat-notices-for-non-mat-companies-404058.html"> Form 29B</a> as missing without checking if the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions were applicable to the company for that year.

Form 29B is required only when a company is liable to pay tax under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. It is a mandatory report used by the company to disclose its "book profits" for determining MAT Liability. If the tax payable under the normal provision is higher than the MAT liability, MAT does not apply, and filing Form 29B is not mandatory. In that case, even if the taxpayers do not file Form 29B, it does not mean they have violated the provisions of Section 115JB(4) of the Income Tax Act.

<iframe title="Embedded post" src="https://www.linkedin.com/embed/feed/update/urn:li:ugcPost:7415021100952252416?collapsed=1" width="504" height="567" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>

If you get such intimation, make sure you reply to it within the specified time. In your response, clarify that Form No. 29B under Section 115JB(4) was not mandatory to be filed because the tax liability under the normal provision was more than the MAT liability.

[related id="405821"]

Once this response is submitted along with the supported explanation, the CPC usually drops the proposed adjustments without any further penalty or consequences. If the issue is still not solved, you can opt for the reprocessing of your <a href="https://studycafe.in/itr-refund-here-is-why-income-tax-dept-may-take-one-year-to-release-your-refund-405790.html">ITR</a>.

The system often flags Form 29B as missing without checking if the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions were applicable to the company for that year.

Received CPC Intimation Asking to File Form 29B? Here is What to Do

High Court Grants Relief in GST Registration Cancellation Over Return Filing Default

ITAT Condones 388-Day Delay Holding Technicalities Cannot Defeat Substantial Justice 

ITAT Holds Indian Branch and Head Office Cannot Be Treated as Separate Entities for Domestic Tax Purposes

ITAT Deletes FTS Addition on Business Support Services Under India-Singapore DTAA

ITAT Gives One More Chance in Rs 1.80 crore Section 69C Addition Case

ITAT Remands Rs 20.50 Lakh Section 69A Addition After Finding Assessee Was Denied Adequate Hearing 

The High Court observed that the adjudicating officer did not have the benefit of the company's response when passing the order.

Karnataka High Court Gives Another Chance in GST Matter Due to Lack of Hearing

The Tribunal upheld a Supreme Court ruling that if the cause of delay given by the appellant is not refuted, the delay should be condoned.

Delay Should Be Condoned if Explanation is Unrefuted: ITAT

The tribunal held that the court or tribunal must follow the principles of substantial justice rather than technicalities.

Non-Service of Income Tax Notice, Ill health of taxpayer, ITAT condones Appeal filing delay

The tribunal held that rejecting accounts solely because some suppliers did not respond was bad in law.

Books of Accounts Cannot be Rejected Without Any Specific Defect: ITAT Kolkata

The company was allowed to file its reply to the notice, and the authorities were directed to review everything before making a final decision.

Karnataka High Court Sends ITC Matter Back to GST Authorities for Reconsideration

Income Tax

Finance

ICAI

Judgement

ITAT

ITAT Delhi

Chartered Accountant

Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

CBDT

ITAT dismisses Revenue’s appeal after AO’s remand report found no defects in assessee’s supporting evidence.

No Addition Sustainable Without Adverse Findings in Remand Report: ITAT

ITAT set aside a Rs 10,000 penalty under Section 272A(1)(d) and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication.