Erroneous Form 29B Demand Notices: System Glitch Triggers MAT Notices for Non-MAT Companies:

The Income Tax Department erroneously issues Form 29B notices to non-MAT companies, causing undue compliance pressure just before the ITR deadline.
Unnecessary Form 29B Demands Causing Stress for Non-MAT Companies

Erroneous Form 29B Demand Notices: System Glitch Triggers MAT Notices for Non-MAT Companies
The Income Tax Department recently issued large quantities of adjustment notices under Section 143(1)(a) to the companies that did not file Form 29B, a general reminder. One strange thing here was that these notices were also issued to companies where Section 115JB (MAT) does not apply. Basically, these are the companies that do not have any book profit or normal taxable income, yet they are being asked to furnish a form (Form 29B) meant only for MAT calculation.
The issue here is that Form 29B is used only for MAT calculation. The form is filled by Chartered Accountants (CAs) to calculate the book profits of companies under Section 115JB. Companies are only required to fill this form in case MAT applies to them (i.e., when their taxable income is less than the MAT rate), and companies possessing normal taxable income above the MAT limit or not having book profits are not required to furnish Form 29B.
It seems like, due to some error in the system, several such notices are automatically being sent to companies where MAT does not apply. This problem has caused unnecessary tension and pressure for companies, taxpayers, and professionals.
Another strange thing is that these notices are being released by the tax department just before the due date of filing revised ITR, i.e., December 31, 2025; hence, taxpayers are left with a very limited time to respond to these notices.
NOTE: According to Section 115JB, if a company’s taxable income is less than 15% of its book profit, then its book profit is treated as taxable, and in that case, MAT applies to the company. In this case, the company is liable to furnish Form 29B only to compute book profits for MAT purposes. The issue discussed above is not minor; penalising companies unnecessarily is not fair. Technology should assist compliance. In the present case, taxpayers are receiving notices even when they are not liable for MAT, which is creating undue stress. Therefore, the Income Tax Department should now review these released notices and withdraw erroneous notices and provide clear guidance.🚨 Systemic Error in 143(1)(a) Processing? 🚨 Income Tax Dept has issued mass 143(1)(a) adjustment notices for non-filing of Form 29B — even where Sec 115JB (MAT) is clearly NOT applicable and there is no book profit / taxable income under normal provisions. ❓ When MAT doesn’t… pic.twitter.com/P5jZCs1xuD
— CA Avinash Kumar Rao (@theavinashrao) December 24, 2025
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2711My Recent Articles
- ITAT Upholds Rs 2.06 Lakh Penalty, Holds Over 5 Year ITR-V Delay Defeats Reasonable Cause ClaimPremium
- GSTN Removes Portal Restriction: Taxpayers Can Now Appeal Against NIL or Zero Demand Orders
- Supreme Court Stays Tripura HC Ruling Holding Bona Fide Buyer Entitled to ITC Despite Supplier’s GST DefaultPremium
- JSW Dulux Secures Rs 10.81 Lakh GST Refund and Penalty Waiver After Karnataka Authorities Set Aside Demand Order
- UCO Bank Invites Applications from CA Firms for Concurrent Audit Engagements; Apply by Sept 15
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Tags
Recent Posts
All Posts









