ROC Chennai Imposes Rs. 50,000 Penalty on Ex-Directors for Non-Filing of Financial Statements:

ROC Chennai Imposes Rs. 50,000 Penalty on Ex-Directors for Non-Filing of Financial Statements

ROC holds ex-directors liable under Section 137(3) despite company being under CIRP; ex-parte adjudication confirms maximum penalty

ROC Penalises Ex-Directors for FY18 Financial Statement Filing Default

authorMeetu KumaridateJan 22, 2026
Last update on Jan 22, 2026
ROC Chennai Imposes Rs. 50,000 Penalty on Ex-Directors for Non-Filing of Financial Statements J.K.S. Construction Private Limited failed to file its financial statements for FY 2017-18 with the Registrar of Companies within the prescribed time. The company’s AGM for the relevant year was held on 30.09.2018, making the due date for filing financial statements 29.10.2018. An inspection of the company’s books and records revealed this non-compliance.
NFRA Cracks Down on Audit File Lapses: 60-Day Completion Rule, 7-Day Submission Deadline, Many More
The company was admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) by the NCLT, Chennai Bench on 11.03.2022. Based on the inspection findings, ROC initiated adjudication proceedings against the ex-directors for violation of Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013. Despite the issuance of notice for e-adjudication and the scheduling of an e-hearing, no response or appearance was made by the ex-directors, and the matter proceeded ex parte. Issue Raised: Whether the failure to file financial statements for FY 2017-18 attracts a penalty under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, and whether ex-directors remain liable even after the commencement of CIRP.
NFRA Cracks Down on Audit File Lapses: 60-Day Completion Rule, 7-Day Submission Deadline, Many More
ROC's Decision: The Registrar of Companies held that the company had clearly contravened Section 137 by not filing its financial statements within the statutory timeline. Since the company was admitted to CIRP, the liability for the default fell upon the ex-directors. Exercising powers under Section 454, the ROC imposed the maximum penalty of Rs. 50,000 on each of the three ex-directors for continuing default. The officers were directed to rectify the default and pay the penalty from their personal funds within 90 days, with liberty to file an appeal before the Regional Director, Chennai. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2161
Up Next

Loading suggestions…