ROC Imposes Penalty on company for failing to alter objects as per change in business line:

ROC imposed a penalty on the company and its directors for failing to file Form MGT-14 after passing a special resolution to amend its Memorandum of Association.
Failure to File Special Resolution Costs Company

ROC Imposes Penalty on company for failing to alter objects as per change in business line
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Kanpur has issued an order of adjudication dated February 04, 2026, imposing a penalty amounting to Rs. 1.75 lakh on a company named Meta Tech Ventures Private Limited and its three directors under Section 454 of the Companies Act 2013.
The disputed company was established in 2018. Since its establishment, the company has been engaged in business according to its objectives. In September 2024, the company got involved in some additional activities, including Information Technology (IT) for its overall development. An Extraordinary General Meeting was conducted on November 03, 2025; there, the company issued a special resolution to amend its Memorandum of Association.
The aim of this action is to grow and match their objectives with the company's existing and suggested business activities. However, to register the said special resolution, the company did not furnish Form MGT-14 dated November 06, 2025. This reflected an explicit violation of the provisions of Section 4 (1) (c) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Considering the same, the concerned authority held the company and its directors liable for penal action under section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013, and hence imposed a penalty amounting to Rs. 1 lakh on the company, Meta Tech Ventures Private Limited and Rs. 75,000 on its three directors named Raj Kumar Agrawal, Megha Agrawal, and Tripti Verma (Rs. 25,000 on each). Additionally, directed to pay the imposed penalty amount and rectify the default within 90 days of receiving the order.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2420My Recent Articles
- Bona Fide Mistake in ITR Cannot Deny Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer a Final Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.27 Crore Cash Deposits Under Section 69APremium
- ITAT Restores Appeals for Fresh Consideration After NFAC Denied Request of Personal Hearing Through Video ConferencingPremium
- ITAT Condones 97-Day Delay, Restores Appeal After CIT(A) Sent Hearing Notices to Wrong Email AddressPremium
- MCA Appoints Justice (Retd.) Yogesh Khanna as Officiating Chairperson of NCLAT for Three Months
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








