ROC Imposes Rs. 3.5 Lakh Penalty on Company and Its Director for Non-Maintenance of Audit Trail:

ROC Imposes Rs. 3.5 Lakh Penalty on Company and Its Director for Non-Maintenance of Audit Trail

ROC levies a penalty of Rs. 3.5 lakh on the company and its director for non-compliance with mandatory audit trail requirements under Section 134(8) of the Companies Act, 2013.

Company and Director Penalised for Accounting Software Audit Trail Lapse

authorSaloni KumaridateJan 8, 2026
Last update on Jan 8, 2026
ROC Imposes Rs. 3.5 Lakh Penalty on Company and Its Director for Non-Maintenance of Audit Trail The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Ahmedabad under the Ministry of Finance (MCA), Government of India, has issued an Adjudication Order dated December 02, 2025, under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, imposing a penalty on a company, namely Topsun Energy Limited, with CIN U31900GJ2007PLC051489, and its one director named Chintan Gandabhai Patel having DIN 01660438, for the contravention of Section 134(8) of the Companies Act, 2013. The company voluntarily filed an application (GNL-1) dated July 30, 2025, for adjudication under Section 134(3)(f) of the Companies Act, 2013. During an internal due diligence, the company found that it had violated Section 134(3)(f) read with Rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014. In the Auditor’s Report for Financial Year 2023-24, the auditors observed that the accounting software used by the company did not have an audit trail (edit log) feature, which is mandatory under the amended rules.
ITAT Upholds 28.59 Lakh Addition on Taxpayer for Unexplained Cash Deposits; Appeal Dismissed
In conclusion to this, auditors could not confirm whether audit trails were properly maintained. Therefore, the default took place in the time period between April 01, 2023, and March 31, 2024, attracting a penalty under Section 134(8), but the non-compliance has now been corrected. In conclusion, the ROC Ahmedabad imposed a penalty of Rs. 3 lakh on the company and Rs. 50,000 on its director, Chintan Gandabhai Patel. The company has been directed to correct the default and pay the imposed penalty amount within 90 days of receipt of the order.
RBI Issues Final Amendment Framework on Lending to Related Parties; Effective April 2026
Additionally, the office asserted that if the company is dissatisfied with the present order, it can further challenge the penalty amount before the Regional Director, RD Ahmedabad, within a period of sixty days from the date of receiving the order.

About Author

Saloni Kumari

Content Writer

Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2390
Up Next

Loading suggestions…