SC Holds Off-Road Construction Equipment Not ‘Motor Vehicles’; Gujarat Road Tax Demands Quashed

Heavy earth-moving machinery used exclusively within factory or enclosed premises falls outside MV Act and Entry 57 List II

SC: Off-Road Construction Equipment Not Taxable as Motor Vehicles

Meetu Kumari | Jan 13, 2026 |

SC Holds Off-Road Construction Equipment Not ‘Motor Vehicles’; Gujarat Road Tax Demands Quashed

SC Holds Off-Road Construction Equipment Not ‘Motor Vehicles’; Gujarat Road Tax Demands Quashed

Ultratech Cement Ltd. operated heavy earth-moving machinery such as dumpers, excavators, loaders, and surface miners exclusively within its factory and enclosed mining premises in Gujarat. The machinery was not used on public roads and was transported only in dismantled form on trailers.

While the Regional Transport Officer initially accepted that registration was not required, the Transport Department later treated the equipment as “motor vehicles” and demanded registration, road tax, interest, and penalty under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958. The Gujarat High Court upheld the levy, leading Ultratech to appeal before the Supreme Court.

Main Issue: Whether heavy earth-moving machinery used exclusively within a factory or enclosed premises can be treated as “motor vehicles” liable to registration and road tax.

SC Decided: The Supreme Court allowed all the appeals and set aside the High Court judgments. The Court held that although such machinery may appear to fall within the inclusive part of the definition of “motor vehicle”, it is expressly excluded by the latter part of Section 2(28), which excludes vehicles of a special type adapted for use only in a factory or enclosed premises.

The Court emphasised that taxation under Entry 57 of List II of the Seventh Schedule is permissible only for vehicles suitable for use on public roads. Off-road construction equipment, used solely within industrial premises and deriving no benefit from public road infrastructure, cannot be subjected to road tax.

Relying on Bolani Ores Ltd. v. State of Orissa, the Court reiterated that “adapted for use upon roads” means “suitable for use on roads” and not merely capable of movement. It also noted that the Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act does not prescribe any rate of tax for construction equipment vehicles.

Therefore, the Court held that such off-road machinery is neither liable for registration nor for road tax unless it is actually used on public roads.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
SC Holds Off-Road Construction Equipment Not ‘Motor Vehicles’; Gujarat Road Tax Demands Quashed Receipts Not ‘Royalty’ as No Use or Right To Use of IP Given to Customers Flipkart Co-Founder Binny Bansal Held Indian Resident; DTAA Relief on Share Sale Denied Turnover of Prior Months Must Be Included for ITC Refund Claimed Later: Madras HC Assessment on Dead Person Invalid: HC Orders Fresh GST Proceedings Against Legal HeirView All Posts