SC Upholds Borrower Redemption Right, Sets Aside Delayed Auction Sale:

Court invalidates delayed SARFAESI auction, allows borrower redemption after full repayment of dues
Delay in auction completion defeats sale, borrower retains redemption right

SC Upholds Borrower Redemption Right, Sets Aside Delayed Auction Sale
The dispute arose from recovery proceedings initiated by SARFAESI Act, 2002 after the borrower firm defaulted on a loan of Rs. 4 crore taken from Central Bank of India. The account was classified as an NPA, following which the bank initiated action under Section 13 and conducted an e-auction on 04.09.2020. Auction purchasers deposited 25% of the bid amount, but confirmation of sale remained stalled due to multiple interim orders passed by the DRT, DRAT, and High Court. The balance 75% was ultimately paid only on 31.03.2022, after dismissal of borrower’s proceedings.
Meanwhile, the borrowers continued litigating and eventually deposited the entire outstanding dues in December 2022. Despite full repayment, the High Court set aside the auction sale and sale certificate, holding that the delay in completing the sale violated statutory timelines. Aggrieved, the auction purchasers and the bank approached the Supreme Court.
Issue Raised: Whether an auction sale under SARFAESI, once confirmed and registered, can be annulled when statutory timelines are breached and the borrower has repaid the entire dues.
SC Held: The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s ruling and dismissed the appeals. It held that the auction sale did not attain legal finality since the balance consideration was not paid within the mandatory timeline prescribed under Rule 9(4). The delay, caused largely due to judicial restraints, could not be used to defeat the borrower’s rights.
The Court emphasized that the right of redemption survives until a legally valid and complete sale is concluded. Since the borrowers had repaid the entire outstanding dues, depriving them of their property would be unjust. Therefore, the auction sale and sale certificates were set aside, and the borrowers were allowed to redeem the secured assets.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








