Software Payments Cannot be Considered as Royalty Without Transferring Copyright:

SC ruled that payments made by Indian end users to foreign software suppliers are not "royalty" and therefore they are not taxable in India, if there is no transfer of copyright in the software.
Software Payments is Not Royalty Without Transfer of Copyright
Table of Contents

Software Payments Cannot be Considered as Royalty Without Transferring Copyright
Assume you buy software from a US company with just a basic license for internal use, no extras. Now, the question is, do you need to deduct tax at source (TDS)? Is this payment considered a "royalty" under Indian tax laws? Will the tax department later ask for tax?
A similar situation led to a long litigation, which the Hon'ble Supreme Court finally settled in 2021. The ruling was in favour of taxpayers. However, the applicability of that decision is not automatic. It depends on whether you have followed the rules under the DTAA (Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement) carefully for it to apply.
Therefore, the favourable tax treatment given by the Supreme Court comes from DTAA provisions and taxpayers must claim this benefit to get it.
Section 90(4) of the Income-tax Act clearly states that a non-resident must provide a Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) from their country they live to claim DTAA relief. Also, Rule 21AB and CBDT Circulars mention specific compliance requirements for DTAA claims.
Engineering Analysis Centre Case
In the judgement of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2021) 432 ITR 471 (SC), the Supreme Court ruled that payments made by Indian end users or distributors to foreign software suppliers are not treated as "royalty" and therefore they are not taxable in India, as long as there is no transfer of copyright in the software.Important Observations of SC
- A license to use software without rights to copy, distribute, sublicense or modify is considered a sale of a copyrighted article. It is not considered a transfer of copyright.
- The court examined four categories for transactions, including direct sales, sales by distributors, bundling with hardware (OEM) and resale by Indian affiliates. The payment made in each category is not a royalty if there is no copyright transfer.
- The court's decision was based on the rules of the DTTA, especially Article 12 and not on Indian tax laws.
Domestic law vs DTTA
The Supreme Court's ruling does not cancel out Indian tax law. According to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, payments for software can still be treated as "royalty" and taxable in India, even if the software is used only for internal business purposes.How DTAA Cancels Domestic Tax Law
| Aspect | Under the Income-tax Act | Under DTAA (e.g., India-US) |
| Meaning of "Royalty" | Wide: includes payments for software use/licenses | Narrow: only applies if there is a transfer of copyright |
| Tax Implications of Software Payments | Taxable in India | Not taxable if it's just a right to use (no copyright) |
| TDS Obligation (Section 195) | Yes, TDS must be deducted | It can be avoided if the DTAA benefit is claimed correctly |
Required Documents for Claiming Benefits Under DTTA
- Tax Residence Certificate
- Form 10F
- PAN of non-resident
- Declaration of No Permanent Establishment (PE) and beneficial ownership
Understanding TDS Applicability
The TDS is applicable in the following conditions:- The software is licensed for internal use only.
- There are no rights given to change, distribute, or sublicense.
- TRC, Form 10F, PAN (or Rule 37BC declaration), and other required documents are submitted.
- The applicable DTAA excludes such payments from the definition of "royalty".
- The license includes rights in copyright.
- The software is custom-developed or part of a technology transfer.
- The non-resident does not provide TRC, Form 10F, or PAN.
- DTAA benefit is not properly claimed.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Engineering Analysis case gave helpful relief to Indian companies that pay for software from abroad. But this relief comes from the tax treaty (DTAA) and not from changes in domestic tax rules. So, if you only depend on the court decision without following the rules under Section 90(4) and Rule 21AB, you might still face unwarranted tax, interest, or penalties.About Author

Nidhi
Content Writer
Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833My Recent Articles
- Karnataka High Court Gives Another Chance in GST Matter Due to Lack of Hearing
- Delay Should Be Condoned if Explanation is Unrefuted: ITAT
- Non-Service of Income Tax Notice, Ill health of taxpayer, ITAT condones Appeal filing delay
- Books of Accounts Cannot be Rejected Without Any Specific Defect: ITAT Kolkata
- Karnataka High Court Sends ITC Matter Back to GST Authorities for Reconsideration
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.







