Company and Directors Fined for Non-Disclosure of Registered Office Change: ROC

ROC Bangalore penalises the company and its directors with Rs 2.14 lakh for non-compliance with registered office address requirements under the Companies Act, 2013.

Company Penalised for Rs 2.14 lakh for Section 12(3)(c) Violation

Saloni Kumari | Apr 8, 2026 |

Company and Directors Fined for Non-Disclosure of Registered Office Change: ROC

Company and Directors Fined for Non-Disclosure of Registered Office Change: ROC

The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Bangalore, has imposed a 2.14 lakh penalty on the company, Minance Investment Advisors Private Limited, and its two directors for committing non-compliance under Section 12(8) of the Companies Act, 2013.

A company under the provisions of Section 12(3)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, is obligated to mention the address of its registered office and the CIN number on its official documents, like Business letters, billboards, and letterhead. However, letters sent to the company at its registered address, i.e., No. 35/37 (Old No. 598), 11th Main Road, Jayanagar, 5th Block, Bangalore – 560041, were returned undelivered with the remark that no such person or firm exists at the mentioned address.

It was, furthermore, noted that the company had not furnished Form INC-22, informing about the revision in the registered office address. Moreover, physical verification at the registered office of the disputed company was conducted on February 26, 2024, where it was discovered that the company had already vacated the premises on May 08, 2019, after its lease expired. The proprietor had given a copy of the officially registered document showing that the lease was surrendered on May 08, 2019. Meaning the disputed company had not been operating at its registered office since May 8, 2019; however, it still did not inform the Registrar of Companies (ROC) about the same within the legally allowed time limit of 30 days.

Consequently, the company and its directors were liable for penal action for committing a violation under Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013. Considering the same, the concerned authorities imposed a penalty of Rs 1 lakh on the company, Minance Investment Advisors Private Limited and Rs 1.14 lakh on its two directors, Anurag Bhatia and Sarbashish Basu.

They have been instructed to pay the imposed penalty amount and rectify the default within 90 days of receiving the order.

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
RBI Releases Guidelines to Facilitate Faster Cross-Border Inward Payments Multi-Agency Crackdown on Jaffer Sadiq: Income Tax Searches Follow Drug Smuggling Probe Best Term Insurance Plans for Women in India Two GST Officials held Red-Handed While Accepting Bribe to approve GST Registration National Seminar on Next-Gen GST Reforms To Be Held in Andhra Pradesh from April 09View All Posts