CA's, CS's cannot appear before Tribunal: Bar Council, Lawyer Association in HC:

The Delhi High Court is examining whether non-advocate professionals like Chartered Accountants and Company Secretaries can legally represent clients before courts and tribunals.
Advocates vs Other Professionals Debate Intensifies

CA's, CS's cannot appear before Tribunal: Bar Council, Lawyer Association in HC
The Delhi High Court heard multiple writ petitions simultaneously on February 16, 2026. All these petitions concerned a similar issue: who is legally authorised to represent clients before courts and tribunals? The Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Madhu Jain have made the final decision on the matter.
The key concern raised in the present writ petition is whether professionals who are not enrolled as advocates, such as chartered accountants, company secretaries, and cost accountants, can appear and argue cases before tribunals on behalf of their clients. The writ petition has been filed by the Bar Council of India, the Association of Tax Lawyers, and Purav Middha.
Before the Delhi High Court, the petitioner raised the key argument that, as per the Advocates Act 1961, only the advocates who are enrolled with a State Bar Council are allowed to argue cases before the courts, tribunals, or other authorities. Additionally, they argued that no other professional is permitted to conduct legal practice as per Sections 30 and 33 of the said Act. They also highlighted provisions of Section 45, which makes other professionals practising unauthorised law liable for penalties.
However, the respondents, on behalf of other professionals, including Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, Cost Accountants, etc., argued that Section 432 of the Companies Act, 2013, along with relevant tribunal rules and practice directions, says that such professionals can represent their client's case before certain tribunals. In one of the similar related cases, the initial petitioner had challenged the constitutional validity of Section 432. However, the petitioner has passed away, and the court has permitted his legal heir to present its case.
In the present writ petitions, the court has granted all the counsels time to furnish any other written submissions or modify the existing ones at least two weeks before the next date of hearing. The matter has been adjourned to March 16, 2026. The court has confirmed that after this, no further adjournments will be given and that the cases will be treated as part-heard.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2738My Recent Articles
- CA Association Seeks Extension in Due Dates of Tax Audit, Form 10B/10BB and ITR Filing for AY 2026-27
- ITAT Dismisses Dell Employee’s Appeal, Holds Address in Meghalaya Not Enough to Claim Section 10(26) Salary ExemptionPremium
- CBI Arrests CGST Superintendent and a Consultant in Rs 1 Crore Bribery Case
- ITAT Deletes Sections 271C and 271CA Penalties Over Bona Fide BeliefPremium
- Rs 24 Crore Cyber Fraud: Mumbai Police Arrest 3 for Supplying Mule Bank Accounts, 2,898 SIMs
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








