ITAT Condones Delay Caused by Mistaken Belief of Assessee's Tax Professional; Remands Matter to CIT(A):

ITAT Condones Delay Caused by Mistaken Belief of Assessee's Tax Professional; Remands Matter to CIT(A)

There was a delay of 93 days in filing this appeal before the Tribunal because of the mistaken belief of their tax professional that the appeal against the quantum order was already filed by the assessee.

ITAT Condones Delay and Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration

authorNidhidateNov 29, 2025
Last update on Nov 29, 2025
ITAT Condones Delay Caused by Mistaken Belief of Assessee's Tax Professional; Remands Matter to CIT(A) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, condoned a delay in filing an appeal caused by a bona fide mistaken belief of the tax professional. The assessee, MNP Associates, received four notices that were sent to the email ID of the employee of the assessee, who did not inform the assessee about the same. This resulted in passing an ex parte order by the CIT(A). Therefore, the assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT, Mumbai, requesting an opportunity to be heard.
ITAT Partly Deletes Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition; Restricts Unexplained Income to 10%
However, there was a delay of 93 days in filing this appeal before the Tribunal because of the mistaken belief of their tax professional that the appeal against the quantum order was already filed by the assessee. Therefore, the assessee requested the ITAT to condone this delay, saying that the same was caused due to the tax professional's bona fide mistake and there was no mala fide intent. The Tribunal observed that the reason for the delay submitted by the assessee is bona fide and there was no malafide intention. It placed reliance on the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Collector Land Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors, which held that Courts must admit the appeals if the applicant satisfies that he had a sufficient cause. Based on this, the Tribunal condones the delay in filing the appeal.
ITAT Deletes Entire Rs. 59.39 Lakh Demonetisation Addition After Finding Cash Withdrawals Fully Supported
Based on the submissions made by the assessee, the Tribunal believed that the assessee deserves an opportunity to be heard. Therefore, the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration, after giving the assessee a proper opportunity of being heard.

About Author

Nidhi

Content Writer

Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833
Up Next

Loading suggestions…