ITAT Orders Fresh Consideration of Subcontractor's Income After Condoning Delay:

ITAT Orders Fresh Consideration of Subcontractor's Income After Condoning Delay

Since the matter was not decided on merits and an ex parte order was passed, the Tribunal set aside the order of CIT(A) and remanded the matter.

ITAT Condones 325 Days Delay, Subject to Cost Payment of Rs 10,000

authorNidhidateDec 7, 2025
Last update on Dec 7, 2025
ITAT Orders Fresh Consideration of Subcontractor's Income After Condoning Delay The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad, condoned a delay in filing the appeal, which was caused due to the personal tragedy of the assessee. The assessee, Shri Gorsa Mohan Kumar Babu, was carrying on a business of contract as a subcontractor. The Assessing Office assessed the income of the assessee by estimating the profit at 8%. However, the assessee contended that the profit margin of the assessee cannot be more than 5% and the same has been supported by several past tribunal decisions. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal due to the delay. Therefore, the assessee finally approached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Hyderabad, requesting to condone the delay.
PCIT Must Resolve Jurisdictional Objections Before Passing Revisionary Order: ITAT
The assessee submitted that the delay was caused by the death of his younger brother, who was managing the execution of contracts and other related matters and the death of his father. Additionally, the appellant was also facing medical issues, causing the delay. He requested the tribunal to condone the delay of 325 days in filing the appeal. The Tribunal considered the reason for the delay and condoned the delay, imposing a cost of Rs 10,000, which was required to be paid to the Prime Minister Relief Fund within one month.
ITAT Delhi Upholds CIT(A) Relief: Rs. 12.20 Crore Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition Deleted
Regarding the estimation of the income of the assessee as the subcontractor, the Tribunal believed that the issue needs to be reconsidered. Since the matter was not decided on merits and an ex parte order was passed, the Tribunal set aside the order of CIT(A) and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration and directed the AO to give an opportunity to be heard to the assessee.

About Author

Nidhi

Content Writer

Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833
Up Next

Loading suggestions…