ITAT: Provisional Registration Can’t Be Cancelled Without Fair Hearing:

ITAT: Provisional Registration Can’t Be Cancelled Without Fair Hearing

CIT(E) Failed to Consider Assessee’s Submissions Before Cancelling Provisional Registration

ITAT Remands Rejection of 12A Registration: No Evidence of Charitable Activity

authorMeetu KumaridateJul 5, 2025
Last update on Jul 5, 2025
ITAT: Provisional Registration Can’t Be Cancelled Without a Fair Hearing The Assessee Foundation, registered under Section 8 of the Companies Act in 2017, was granted provisional registration under Section 12AB on 30.11.2022 for AYs 2023-24 to 2025-26. The trust applied for regular registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) via Form 10AB on September 18, 2023, which was within the statutory timeline. In response to notices issued by the CIT (Exemption), the trust submitted replies, including its reasons for not conducting charitable activities yet, citing donor hesitancy pending 80G approval. The CIT (Exemption), however, rejected the application on 28.03.2024 and simultaneously cancelled the provisional registration, citing the absence of charitable activities in prior years, the non-genuine nature of operations, and insufficient documentation. Aggrieved, the assessee challenged the order before the ITAT.
Tribunal Gives Second Chance After 328 Day Delay: But Imposes Rs. 10,000 Fine
Issue Raised: Whether the rejection of registration under Section 12A and cancellation of provisional registration were justified in the absence of charitable activities during the initial years.
ITAT Restores Appeal after NFAC Passed Ex-parte, Non-speaking Order
ITAT's Decision: The ITAT held that the CIT (Exemption) had prematurely rejected the application without considering the factual context, including the pending commencement of activities and submissions already filed by the trust. It found that the opportunity for full and fair consideration of documents was not afforded to the assessee. In the interest of natural justice, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the CIT(Exemption) to reconsider the application and documents afresh. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes only, with directions for proper adjudication. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2161
Up Next

Loading suggestions…